Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May;62(2):181-191.
doi: 10.1007/s00411-023-01022-7. Epub 2023 Apr 8.

Recent review of natural and artificial background radiation dosimetry studies in Saudi Arabia

Affiliations
Review

Recent review of natural and artificial background radiation dosimetry studies in Saudi Arabia

Ibrahim B Mansir et al. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2023 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

This paper includes a review of the natural background radiation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The review deals with natural radioactivity measurements conducted in the past few decades in the Kingdom. The numerous research works reviewed refer to different materials soils processed building material, terrestrial (dwellings) and mining sites. For the measurements, different experimental techniques were adopted. The highest mean specific activity of 238U, 232Th and 40 K in soil samples was found to be 39.0, 25.6, and 343.0 Bq/kg, respectively. While the world average values are 33, 45 and 420 Bq/kg, respectively. For building materials, the highest mean values for 226Ra, 232Th and 40 K were 89, 106 and 773 Bq/kg, respectively. The mean indoor and outdoor dose rates were 455 µGy/y (Riyadh City) and 883 µGy/y (Al-Khamis City), respectively. For the mining sites the mean values for 238U, 226Ra, 228Ra, gross α and gross β, were 0.12, 0.33, 21, 0.78 and 2.44 Bq/kg, respectively. Based on the available data it is concluded that most of the natural background radiation levels in the measured locations were within acceptable limits, while a few isolated locations showed elevated dose rates. This review suggests that new improved radiological survey methods be employed to cover the entire country, and that areas identified with comparably high dose rates be re-assessed, especially, in dwellings and mining sites.

Keywords: Dosimetry; Natural background radiation; Radiation measurements; Saudi Arabia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aboud E, Alqahtani F, Osman AH (2019) Radiation map for King Abdulaziz University campus and surrounding areas. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 12(1):260–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/16878507.2019.1650224 - DOI
    1. Abu-Jarad F, Al-Jarallah MI (1984) Radon activity in saudi houses. Nucl Tracks Radiat Meas 8:395–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-245X(84)90128-5 - DOI
    1. Alaamer AS (2008) Assessment of human exposures to natural sources of radiation in soil of riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Turkish. J Eng Environ Sci 32:229–234. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1206-56 - DOI
    1. Al-Asadi Lubna A (2019) Gamma background radiations and measurements with applications use gamma radiat. Tech Peac Appl. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.83721 - DOI
    1. Alashrah S, El-Taher A (2016) Assessment of natural radioactivity level and radiation hazards in soil samples of Wadi Al- Rummah Qassim province, Saudi Arabia. J Environ Biol 37:985–991

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources