A simplified nasopharyngeal swab collection procedure for minimizing patient discomfort while retaining sample quality
- PMID: 37033037
- PMCID: PMC10076767
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1066934
A simplified nasopharyngeal swab collection procedure for minimizing patient discomfort while retaining sample quality
Abstract
A nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) is the most frequently collected sample type when molecular diagnosis of respiratory viruses, including SARS CoV-2, is required. An optimal collection technique would provide sufficient sample quality for the diagnostic process and would minimize the discomfort felt by the patient. This study compares a simplified NPS collection procedure with only one rotation of the swab to a more standard procedure with five rotations. Swabs were collected from 76 healthy volunteers by the same healthcare professional on 2 consecutive days at a similar hour to minimize variability. The number of Ubiquitin C copy number per sample was measured by real-time quantitative PCR and patient discomfort was assessed by questionnaire. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.15) was observed in the Ubiquitin C copy number per sample between a NPS collected with one rotation (5.2 ± 0.6 log UBC number copies/sample) or five rotations (5.3 ± 0.5 log UBC number copies/sample). However, a statistically significant difference was observed in discomfort between these two procedures, the second being much more uncomfortable. Additional analysis of the results showed a weak correlation between discomfort and the number of human cells recovered (Spearman's rho = 0.202) and greater discomfort in younger people. The results of this study show that a NPS collected with one slow rotation has the same quality as a NPS collected with five rotations. However, the collection time is shorter and, most importantly, less unpleasant for patients.
Keywords: Ubiquitin C; collection procedure; discomfort score; nasopharyngeal swab; sample quality.
Copyright © 2023 Uršič, Kogoj, Šikonja, Jevšnik Virant and Petrovec.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Discomfort in Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimen Collection for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis.Clin Ter. 2021 Sep 29;172(5):448-452. doi: 10.7417/CT.2021.2357. Clin Ter. 2021. PMID: 34625778
-
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34730436 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Gargle, Spit, and Sputum Specimens.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0003521. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00035-21. Epub 2021 Aug 25. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34431686 Free PMC article.
-
Gargle lavage as a viable alternative to swab for detection of SARS-CoV-2.Indian J Med Res. 2020 Jul & Aug;152(1 & 2):77-81. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2987_20. Indian J Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32820725 Free PMC article.
-
Nasopharyngeal versus nasal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review.Rhinology. 2021 Oct 1;59(5):410-421. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.162. Rhinology. 2021. PMID: 34666340
Cited by
-
Specimen adequacy assay controls in nucleic acid amplification tests do not correlate with nasopharyngeal swab collection method.J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Oct 16;62(10):e0097524. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00975-24. Epub 2024 Sep 16. J Clin Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39283073 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Organization WH . Interim Guidance 19 March 2020. Laboratory Testing for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Suspected Human Cases. Geneva:WHO (2020).
-
- Center for Disease Control Prevention. Interim Guidlines for Collecting and Handling of Clinical Specimens for COVID-19 testing. (2022). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-specim...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous