Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles - Current Perspectives
- PMID: 37033132
- PMCID: PMC10077738
- DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_162_22
Premature Progesterone Elevation in in vitro Fertilisation Cycles - Current Perspectives
Abstract
The impact of premature elevation of progesterone (PPE) on the day of the trigger on pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles has been a matter of contention and debate for decades. Research over the last 30 years has indicated that PPE >1.5 ng/ml is associated with declining live birth rates following fresh embryo transfer. Freeze-only approach has become a universal solution to overcome the issue of PPE. However, the topic is still mired with controversy. Few studies have not shown a negative impact on pregnancy rates. The impact of PPE on embryological parameters such as oocyte and embryo quality and ploidy is still very controversial. An important contentious issue is the choice of the threshold P value above which it is considered abnormal and a freeze-all strategy would be cost-effective. Currently, though a cutoff of >1.5 ng/ml is widely used, practices are not uniform and varying thresholds from 0.4 to 3 ng/ml are utilised. This review addresses the current understanding of PPE in IVF and the above controversies. The incidence, aetiology and source of progesterone rise, impact on endometrial receptivity, oocyte and embryo quality, impact on live birth and cumulative live birth and impact on frozen embryo transfer and donor oocyte cycles are discussed. Current controversies regarding the optimal threshold, assay performance and future directions are addressed.
Keywords: High progesterone; in vitro fertilisation; pregnancy rate; premature progesterone elevation.
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
The author is an Associate Editor of the Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. She has not participated in the peer review or editorial decision-making process for this article.
Similar articles
-
Is a freeze-all policy the optimal solution to circumvent the effect of late follicular elevated progesterone? A multicentric matched-control retrospective study analysing cumulative live birth rate in 942 non-elective freeze-all cycles.Hum Reprod. 2021 Aug 18;36(9):2463-2472. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab160. Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 34223890
-
The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):362-367. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew296. Epub 2016 Dec 16. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 27986817 Free PMC article.
-
Late follicular phase progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation is not associated with decreased implantation of chromosomally screened embryos in thaw cycles.Hum Reprod. 2020 Aug 1;35(8):1889-1899. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa123. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32649755
-
Effect of progesterone elevation in follicular phase of IVF-cycles on the endometrial receptivity.Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Apr;34(4):422-428. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 24. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017. PMID: 28162937 Review.
-
Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis.Hum Reprod. 2019 Mar 1;34(3):491-505. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey388. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30689865
Cited by
-
The study on the clinical efficacy of endometrial receptivity analysis and influence factors of displaced window of implantation.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91745-y. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40025209 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Progesterone Level on Trigger Day to Basal Progesterone Ratio and in vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer Outcomes in Antagonist Protocols.Int J Womens Health. 2025 Mar 8;17:663-671. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S506574. eCollection 2025. Int J Womens Health. 2025. PMID: 40078508 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of influencing factors on the rate of high-quality embryos induced by rectangular plan during in vitro fertilization.Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):986-991. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.10188. Pak J Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40290238 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, Simón C, Remohí J, Jenkins J, et al. Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: Analysis of over 4000 cycles. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2092–100. - PubMed
-
- Labarta E, Martínez-Conejero JA, Alamá P, Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simón C, et al. Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: A functional genomics analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1813–25. - PubMed
-
- Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:433–57. - PubMed
-
- Healy MW, Patounakis G, Connell MT, Devine K, DeCherney AH, Levy MJ, et al. Does a frozen embryo transfer ameliorate the effect of elevated progesterone seen in fresh transfer cycles? Fertil Steril. 2016;105:93–9.e1. - PubMed
-
- Drakopoulos P, Racca A, Errázuriz J, De Vos M, Tournaye H, Blockeel C, et al. The role of progesterone elevation in IVF. Reprod Biol. 2019;19:1–5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources