Satisfaction With the Use of Subdermal Contraceptive Implant in Women Attending the Specialized Polyclinic Primary Health Care Center in Jeddah City: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 37033501
- PMCID: PMC10081069
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35902
Satisfaction With the Use of Subdermal Contraceptive Implant in Women Attending the Specialized Polyclinic Primary Health Care Center in Jeddah City: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background Subdermal contraceptive implants are a convenient method of contraception for many women due to the ease of insertion and removal and because they require less follow-up with their health facility. In addition to the contraceptive benefits, women's satisfaction with such devices is essential, as this can affect their quality of life. This study aims to measure women's satisfaction with the subdermal contraceptive implant, Implanon® (Organon & Co., Jersey City, New Jersey, United States), its main side effects, and reasons for removal. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on women between the ages of 19 and 65 years who visited the Family Planning Clinic at the Specialized Polyclinic Primary Health Care Center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2018 and December 2021. An online questionnaire was distributed to the women who had Implanon inserted and 84 responded. Demographic and contraceptive data were collected, including the dates of insertion and removal of Implanon and side effects experienced while on Implanon. Results Of the 84 women, 65.84% were satisfied with Implanon, while only 19.04% were unsatisfied with the implant. The most common side effect reported was weight gain (54.76%), followed by menstrual Irregularity. (39.29%). The most common reason for removal was the end of the implant's contraceptive duration (42.86%). Conclusion Most of the women treated at this primary healthcare clinic were satisfied with Implanon. In addition, most of the women removed the implant only due to its reaching the end of its contraceptive duration despite experiencing side effects, and most women said that they would recommend it to their family and friends.
Keywords: contraception; implanon; long-term contraceptive; patient satisfaction; subdermal implant.
Copyright © 2023, Wali et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Women's perceptions with use of Implanon® contraceptive device at a primary healthcare facility in KwaZulu-Natal.Health SA. 2023 Oct 20;28:2016. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2016. eCollection 2023. Health SA. 2023. PMID: 37927943 Free PMC article.
-
User perspectives on Implanon NXT in South Africa: A survey of 12 public-sector facilities.S Afr Med J. 2017 Oct 1;107(10):815-821. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i10.12833. S Afr Med J. 2017. PMID: 29397680
-
Subdermal contraceptive implants.J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995 Jun;53(1-6):223-6. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(95)00051-z. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995. PMID: 7626459 Review.
-
[Acceptability of the etonogestrel-containing contraceptive implant (Implanon)].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004 Sep;33(5):407-15. doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96548-9. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004. PMID: 15480280 French.
-
Subdermal contraceptive implants in nurse-midwifery practice.J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 Mar-Apr;38(2 Suppl):80S-87S. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(93)90100-u. J Nurse Midwifery. 1993. PMID: 8483013 Review.
Cited by
-
Subdermal implants vs. levonorgestrel intrauterine devices outcomes in reproductive-aged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Apr;311(4):1173-1180. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-07943-6. Epub 2025 Mar 11. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 40069520 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Implanon: a critical review. Le J, Tsourounis C. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35:329–336. - PubMed
-
- Implanon™ Package Insert. Jersey City, New Jersey: Organon & Co.; [ Oct; 2022 ]. 2006. Organon pharmaceuticals: Implanon [package insert]. U. S Food and Drug Administration website.
-
- Etonogestrel (Implanon), another treatment option for contraception. Maddox DD, Rahman Z. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2683610/ PT. 2008;33:337–347.
-
- The contraceptive implant. Hohmann H, Creinin MD. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50:907–917. - PubMed
-
- Implanon: a new contraceptive implant. Fischer MA. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37:361–368. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources