Synchronization of estrus using progesterone injections followed by human menopausal gonadotropin in ewes
- PMID: 37033779
- PMCID: PMC10073809
- DOI: 10.30466/vrf.2022.542734.3311
Synchronization of estrus using progesterone injections followed by human menopausal gonadotropin in ewes
Abstract
Serial progesterone injections followed by human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG), instead of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG), were used to synchronize estrus in ewes. Shal ewes (n = 189) were assigned into five groups and each group was divided into two sub-groups to receive gonadotropins including eCG (300 IU; intra-muscular) or hMG (one ampoule; subcutaneously, SC). All ewes received prostaglandin (PG) F2α six days after introducing ram (day 0). Ewes received 0 (control), one, two, three or four injections of progesterone (50.00 mg; SC), 72 hr apart. The first progesterone was injected at the time of PG injection. Ewes in treatment groups received gonadotropins 48 hr after the last progesterone injection. Control group ewes received gonadotropins, at the time of PG injection. Mating was recorded after introducing fertile rams. Data were analyzed using GLM and GENMOD procedures in SAS. The incidence of estrus was less in control and ewes received a single progesterone (34.20%) compared to ewes received two (64.10%), three (81.10%) and four injections (68.40%) of progesterone. Time to estrus was earlier in control (45.70 ± 4.41 hr) than progesterone-treated groups (63.60 ± 1.79 hr). Fertility (51.30%) and fecundity (78.40%) of ewes received three progesterone injections were significantly greater than other progesterone-treated groups. There was no significant difference in reproductive indices between eCG and hMG sub-groups. In conclusion, during the non-breeding season, three injections of progesterone, three days apart, starting six days after ram exposure, in association with hMG, 48 hr after the last progesterone injection, could provide a sound reproductive performance in Shal ewes.
Keywords: Human menopausal gonadotropin; Progesterone injection; Reproductive performance; Shal ewes.
© 2023 Urmia University. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of scientific interest with respect to the manuscript.
Figures


References
-
- Hogue DE. Frequent lambing systems. In: Fayez I, Marai M, Owen JB, editors. New techniques in sheep production. Oxford, UK:: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1987. pp. 57–63.
-
- Bartlewski PM, Beard AP, Cook SJ, et al. Ovarian follicular dynamics during anestrus in ewes. J Reprod Fertil. 1998;113(2):275–285. - PubMed
-
- Souza CJ, Campbell BK, Baird DT. Follicular dynamics and ovarian steroid secretion in sheep during anoestrus. J Reprod Fertil. 1996;108(1):101–106. - PubMed
-
- Robinson TJ. Role of progesterone in the mating behaviour of the ewe. Nature. 1952;170(4322):373–374. - PubMed
-
- Fabre-Nys C, Gelez H. Sexual behavior in ewes and other domestic ruminants. Horm Behav. 2007;52(1):18–25. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources