Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 24;8(13):11674-11699.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00591. eCollection 2023 Apr 4.

Green Surfactants (Biosurfactants): A Petroleum-Free Substitute for Sustainability-Comparison, Applications, Market, and Future Prospects

Affiliations
Review

Green Surfactants (Biosurfactants): A Petroleum-Free Substitute for Sustainability-Comparison, Applications, Market, and Future Prospects

Vaishnavi S Nagtode et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

Surfactants are a group of amphiphilic molecules (i.e., having both hydrophobic and hydrophilic domains) that are a vital part of nearly every contemporary industrial process such as in agriculture, medicine, personal care, food, and petroleum. In general surfactants can be derived from (i) petroleum-based sources or (ii) microbial/plant origins. Petroleum-based surfactants are obvious results from petroleum products, which lead to petroleum pollution and thus pose severe problems to the environment leading to various ecological damages. Thus, newer techniques have been suggested for deriving surfactant molecules and maintaining environmental sustainability. Biosurfactants are surfactants of microbial or plant origins and offer much added advantages such as high biodegradability, lesser toxicity, ease of raw material availability, and easy applicability. Thus, they are also termed "green surfactants". In this regard, this review focused on the advantages of biosurfactants over the synthetic surfactants produced from petroleum-based products along with their potential applications in different industries. We also provided their market aspects and future directions that can be considered with selections of biosurfactants. This would open up new avenues for surfactant research by overcoming the existing bottlenecks in this field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Possible systematic modifications of sugar-based surfactants centered on octyl-β-d-glucoside. Adapted with permission from ref (70). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Sorbitan Esters by Intramolecular Dehydration of Sorbitol in the Presence of Acid
RCOOH: fatty acids. Adapted with permission from ref (68). Copyright 1999 John Wiley and Sons.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Sucrose Esters by Base Catalyzed Transesterification with Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (R′COOMe)
Adapted with permission from ref (68). Copyright 1999 John Wiley and Sons.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3. Reaction of Glucose and Fatty Alcohol to Form Alkyl Polyglycosides (APGs) Carrying Units of Glucose
Adapted with permission from ref (68). Copyright 1999 John Wiley and Sons.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4. Formation of Fatty Acid N-Methylglucamide with Two-Step Process
Adapted with permission from ref (68). Copyright 1999 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Types of microbial surfactants: (a) mannosylerythritol lipid; (b) surfactin; (c) trehalose lipid; (d) sophorolipid; (e) rhamnolipid.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Types of amino acid based surfactant: (I) linear or single chain; (II) dimeric or gemini; (III) glycerolipid-like/glycolipid-like.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flowchart representing formation of petro-based surfactants from nonrenewable sources.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5. Reaction Forming Alkylbenzene Sulfonic Acid from Alkylbenzene
Scheme 6
Scheme 6. Reaction Forming α-Olefin Sulfonates
Scheme 7
Scheme 7. Reaction Forming Alkane Sulfonates
Scheme 8
Scheme 8. Reaction Forming Monoester Sulfosuccinate
Figure 5
Figure 5
Classification of biosurfactants based on molecular weight.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Manufacturing process for rhamnolipids.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Manufacturing process for sophorolipids.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Manufacturing process for surfactin.
Scheme 9
Scheme 9. Different Routes to Form Fatty Alcohol Sulfates
Scheme 10
Scheme 10. Reaction to Form Fatty Acid Methylesters
Scheme 11
Scheme 11. Reaction to Form Sucroesters
Figure 9
Figure 9
General properties of biosurfactants.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Methods used to test biosurfactant efficiencies.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Comparison between synthetic surfactants and biosurfactants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ricardo F.; Ruiz-Puentes P.; Reyes L. H.; Cruz J. C.; Alvarez O.; Pradilla D. Estimation and prediction of the air-water interfacial tension in conventional and peptide surface-active agents by random Forest regression. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 265, 118208.10.1016/j.ces.2022.118208. - DOI
    1. De S.; Malik S.; Ghosh A.; Saha R.; Saha B. A review on natural surfactants. RSC Adv. 2015, 5 (81), 65757–65767. 10.1039/C5RA11101C. - DOI
    1. Kralova I.; Sjöblom J. Surfactants Used in Food Industry: A Review. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2009, 30 (9), 1363–1383. 10.1080/01932690902735561. - DOI
    1. Dias M. A. M.; Nitschke M. Bacterial-derived surfactants: an update on general aspects and forthcoming applications. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2023, 54, 103–123. 10.1007/s42770-023-00905-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirtil E.; Oztop M. H. Mechanism of adsorption for design of role-specific polymeric surfactants. Chem. Pap. 2023, 10.1007/s11696-022-02636-9. - DOI