Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 24:10:1106503.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1106503. eCollection 2023.

Is the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) excessive in post-angioplasty in chronic coronary syndrome? Data from the France-PCI registry (2014-2019)

Affiliations

Is the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) excessive in post-angioplasty in chronic coronary syndrome? Data from the France-PCI registry (2014-2019)

A Mezier et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: while the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following coronary angioplasty for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) recommended by the European Society of Cardiology has decreased over the last decade, little is known about the adherence to those guidelines in clinical practice in France.

Aim: To analyze the real duration of DAPT post coronary angioplasty in CCS, as well as the factors affecting this duration.

Methods: Between 2014 and 2019, 8.836 percutaneous coronary interventions for CCS from the France-PCI registry were evaluated, with 1 year follow up, after exclusion of patients receiving oral anticoagulants, procedures performed within one year of an acute coronary syndrome, and repeat angioplasty.

Results: Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) DAPT duration was > 12 months for 53.1% of patients treated for CCS; 30.5% had a DAPT between 7 and 12 months, and 16.4% a DAPT ≤ 6 months. Patients with L-DAPT (>12 months) were at higher ischemic risk [25.0% of DAPT score ≥2 vs. 18.8% DAPT score ≥2 in S&I-DAPT group (≤12 months)]. The most commonly used P2Y12 inhibitor was clopidogrel (82.2%). The prescription of ticagrelor increased over the period.

Conclusions: post-PCI DAPT duration in CCS was higher than international recommendations in the France PCI registry between 2014 and 2019. More than half of the angioplasty performed for CCS are followed by a DAPT > 12 months. Ischemic risk assessment influences the duration of DAPT. This risk is probably overestimated nowadays, leading to a prolongation of DAPT beyond the recommended durations, thus increasing the bleeding risk.

Keywords: bleeding risk; chronic coronary syndrome; coronary angioplasty; dual antiplatelet therapy; ischemic risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CCS, chronic coronary syndrome; MI, myocardial infarction, NSTEMI, non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TAVI, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
DAPT duration after coronary angioplasty for CCS in the France PCI registry (2014–2019) [n = number of procedures (%)]. CCS, chronic coronary syndrome; S-DAPT, short dual antiplatelet therapy; I-DAPT, short & intermediate dual antiplatelet therapy; L-DAPT, long dual antiplatelet therapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of DAPT duration for CCS post angioplasty by year (%) (2014–2019). DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of the DAPT score (A). Distribution of dual antiplatelet therapy duration according to DAPT score (B). DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; S&I-DAPT, short and intermediate dual antiplatelet therapy (≤12 months); L-DAPT, long dual antiplatelet therapy (>12 months).

References

    1. Machado C, Raposo L, Dores H, Leal S, Campante Teles R, de Araújo Gonçalves P, et al. Second-generation versus first-generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes and obstructive coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis. (2014) 25(3):208–14. 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collet JP, Silvain J, Kerneis M, Cuisset T, Meneveau N, Boueri Z, et al. Clinical outcome of first- vs second-generation DES according to DAPT duration: results of ARCTIC-generation. Clin Cardiol. (2016) 39(4):192–200. 10.1002/clc.22512 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and of the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. (2018) 39(3):213–60. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J. (2013) 34(38):2949–3003. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41(3):407–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources