Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam-ketamine, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, midazolam-fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 37034838
- PMCID: PMC10079769
- DOI: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.2.69
Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam-ketamine, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, midazolam-fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: In order to assess the effectiveness of various analgesio-sedative combinations for pain relief and sedation in pediatric dental patients, a thorough evaluation of clinical studies and patient outcomes is necessary.
Methods: A total of 128 healthy, uncooperative pediatric dental patients were randomly allocated to receive one of the four combinations of drugs via the intranasal (IN) route: Group I received midazolam-ketamine (MK), Group II received dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK), Group III received midazolam-fentanyl (MF), and Group IV received dexmedetomidine-fentanyl (DF) in a parallel-arm study design. The efficacy and safety of the combinations were evaluated using different parameters.
Results: The onset of sedation was significantly faster in the DF group than in the DK, MF, and MK groups (P < 0.001). The depth of sedation was significantly higher in the DK and DF groups than in the MK and MF groups (P < 0.01). DK and DF produced significant intra- and postoperative analgesia when compared with combinations of MK and MF. No significant adverse events were observed for any of the combinations.
Conclusions: The DK and DF groups showed potential as analgesio-sedatives in view of their anxiolytic and analgesic effects.
Keywords: Analgesio-sedation; Dental anxiety; Dexmedetomidine; Fentanyl; Ketamine; Midazolam.
Copyright © 2023 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Hosey MT. Anxious children: coping in dental practice. Dent Update. 1995;22:210–215. - PubMed
-
- Milgrom P, Fiset L, Melnick S, Weinstein P. The prevalence and practice management consequences of dental fear in a major US city. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;116:641–647. - PubMed
-
- De Jongh A, Adair P, Meijerink-Anderson M. Clinical management of dental anxiety: what works for whom? Int Dent J. 2005;55:73–80. - PubMed
-
- Folayan MO, Faponle A, Lamikanra A. Seminars on controversial issues. A review of the pharmacological approach to the management of dental anxiety in children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12:347–354. - PubMed
-
- Krauss B, Green SM. Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet. 2006;367:766–780. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
