Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 16;26(4):106423.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106423. eCollection 2023 Apr 21.

Methacrylated human recombinant collagen peptide as a hydrogel for manipulating and monitoring stiffness-related cardiac cell behavior

Affiliations

Methacrylated human recombinant collagen peptide as a hydrogel for manipulating and monitoring stiffness-related cardiac cell behavior

Dylan Mostert et al. iScience. .

Abstract

Environmental stiffness is a crucial determinant of cell function. There is a long-standing quest for reproducible and (human matrix) bio-mimicking biomaterials with controllable mechanical properties to unravel the relationship between stiffness and cell behavior. Here, we evaluate methacrylated human recombinant collagen peptide (RCPhC1-MA) hydrogels as a matrix to control 3D microenvironmental stiffness and monitor cardiac cell response. We show that RCPhC1-MA can form hydrogels with reproducible stiffness in the range of human developmental and adult myocardium. Cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) and cardiac fibroblasts (cFBs) remain viable for up to 14 days inside RCPhC1-MA hydrogels while the effect of hydrogel stiffness on extracellular matrix production and hPSC-CM contractility can be monitored in real-time. Interestingly, whereas the beating behavior of the hPSC-CM monocultures is affected by environmental stiffness, this effect ceases when cFBs are present. Together, we demonstrate RCPhC1-MA to be a promising candidate to mimic and control the 3D biomechanical environment of cardiac cells.

Keywords: Biomaterials; Cell biology; Materials in biotechnology; Stem cells research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

H.A. van Boxtel is an employee of Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V. The results of this study were not influenced by him or any other employee of Fujifilm Manufacturing Europe B.V.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Reaction scheme for RCPhC1 modification
Figure 2
Figure 2
RCPhC1-MA material characterization (A and B) Young’s modulus varies with different illumination time, dosage, and the degree of methacrylation (%DS, n = 3). (C) Young’s modulus of RCPhC1-MA hydrogels upon varying %DS (n = 3-9). (D) Mass swelling percentage differs with %DS (n = 3). (E) Degradation of RCPhC1-MA hydrogels with various %DS in the presence of collagenase (n = 3). (F-H) SEM of surface relief of RCPhC1-MA gels of varying %DS. ∗ = p < 0.05, ∗∗ = p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗ = p < 0.0001. Scale bar = 5 μm. All data are presented as mean ± SEM. For multiple group comparison, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post-hoc test was used.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cytocompatibility of RCPhC1-MA (A and B) Quantification of cFB (A) and hPSC-CM (B) viability in 3D culture inside RCPhC1-MA hydrogels with varying %DS over 1, 7, and 14 days (n = 3). (C-E) hPSC-CMs and cFBs (70:30) cultured in low %DS and intermediate %DS exhibited a clustered morphology, as opposed to the more spread-out morphology in the high %DS. Notable organized sarcomeric α-actinin is found in all constructs after 7 days of encapsulation. ∗∗ = p < 0.01. Scale bar = 20 μm. All data are presented as mean ± SEM. For multiple group comparison, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post-hoc test was used.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Collagen production and hydrogel stiffness with time over 14-day culture period (A, D, and G) Micro-indentation data depicting hydrogel stiffness over time in cell-free (- cells) and cell-laden (+cells) hydrogel constructs (n = 3 per condition). ∗ = p < 0.05, ∗∗ = p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001. All data are presented as mean ± SEM. For multiple group comparison, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post-hoc test was used. (B, C, E, F, H, I) Representative fluorescent images demonstrating collagen production (green, CNA-35-OG) and F-actin (magenta, phalloidin) in the RCPhC1-MA constructs with time. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
CM contractility is affected by both culture time and hydrogel stiffness (A and B) Bar graphs indicating the effect of culture time and %DS on hPSC-CM beating frequency in monocultures (A) and hPSC-CM/cFB co-cultures (B), accompanied by a summary of the two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) results to analyze interaction effects. (C and D) Bar graphs indicating the effect of culture time and %DS on hPSC-CM contraction amplitude (a.u.) in monocultures (C) and hPSC-CM/cFB co-cultures (D), accompanied by a summary of the two-way ANOVA results to analyze interaction effects. a, significance vs. day 1 group; b, significance vs. day 3 group; c, significance vs. day 8 group; ∗, significance vs. low %DS within each time period; #, significance vs. intermediate %DS within each time period. Significant differences between timepoints and between %DS were determined using one-way ANOVA (n = 3-15 cell clusters analyzed per condition). p < 0.05. All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Moreover, two-way ANOVA was performed to assess the interaction effects of culture time and %DS on hPSC-CM contraction frequency and amplitude. See also Video S1: Encapsulated hPSC-CMs in the low %DS hydrogels after eight days of culture. Related to Figure 5, Video S2: Encapsulated hPSC-CMs in the intermediate %DS hydrogels after eight days of culture. Related to Figure 5, Video S3: Encapsulated hPSC-CMs in the high %DS hydrogels after eight days of culture. Related to Figure 5.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Milani-Nejad N., Janssen P.M.L. Small and large animal models in cardiac contraction research: advantages and disadvantages. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014;141:235–249. doi: 10.1016/J.PHARMTHERA.2013.10.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kusunose K., Penn M.S., Zhang Y., Cheng Y., Thomas J.D., Marwick T.H., Popović Z.B. How similar are the mice to men? Between-species comparison of left ventricular mechanics using strain imaging. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40061. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0040061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Savoji H., Mohammadi M.H., Rafatian N., Toroghi M.K., Wang E.Y., Zhao Y., Korolj A., Ahadian S., Radisic M. Cardiovascular disease models: a game changing paradigm in drug discovery and screening. Biomaterials. 2019;198:3–26. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2018.09.036. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zuppinger C. 3D cardiac cell culture: a critical Review of current technologies and applications. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2019;6:87. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00087. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callaghan N.I., Hadipour-Lakmehsari S., Lee S.H., Gramolini A.O., Simmons C.A. Modeling cardiac complexity: advancements in myocardial models and analyticaltechniques for physiological investigation and therapeutic development invitro. APL Bioeng. 2019;3 doi: 10.1063/1.5055873. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources