Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;15(2):159-165.
doi: 10.1177/17585732211065449. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach

Affiliations

Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced head-split type humeral fractures and role of the rotator-interval approach

E Fleischhacker et al. Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of humeral head split fractures is challenging because of high instability and limited visibility. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the extend of the approach through the rotator interval (RI) on the reduction quality and functional outcome.

Methods: 37 patients (mean age: 59 ± 16 years,16 female) treated by ORIF through a standard deltopectoral (DP) approach were evaluated. The follow-up period was at least two years. In 17 cases, the approach was extended through the RI. Evaluation was based on radiographs, Constant scores (CS) and DASH scores.

Results: In group DP, "anatomic" reduction was achieved in 9 cases (45%), "acceptable" in 5 cases (25%), and "malreduced" in 6 cases (30%). In group RI, "anatomic" reduction was seen in 12 cases (71%), "acceptable" in 5 cases (29%), and "malreduced" in none (p = 0.04). In the DP group, the CS was 60.2 ± 16.2 and the %CS was 63.9 ± 22.3, while in the RI group, the CS was 74.5 ± 17.4 and the %CS was 79.1 ± 24.1 (p = 0.07, p = 0.08). DASH score was 22.8 ± 19.5 in DP compared to RI: 25.2 ± 20.6 (p = 0.53).

Conclusions: The RI approach improves visualization as it enhances quality of fracture reduction, however functional outcomes may not differ significantly.

Type of study and level of proof: Retrospective, level III.

Keywords: avascular necrosis; constant-score; head-split; humerus fracture; osteosynthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Ct images of patients with headsplit fractures included in the study: dislocated (>5 mm) fractures (arrows) located >5 mm within the cartilaginous articular surface. Left, 3D reconstruction of a CT scan; right, a coronal slice.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Establishing the rotator interval approach

References

    1. Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64: 407–414. - PubMed
    1. Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, et al.. Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 442: 87–92. - PubMed
    1. Nho SJ, Brophy RH, Barker JU, et al.. Management of proximal humeral fractures based on current literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 : 44–58. - PubMed
    1. Ockert B, Biermann N, Haasters F, et al.. [Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for primary fracture treatment. Displaced three and four part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly patient]. Unfallchirurg 2013; 116: 684–690. - PubMed
    1. Sudkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, et al.. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1320–1328. - PubMed