Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;47(5):640-648.
doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2171627. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

Wheelchair users' satisfaction after provision using the WHO 8-step guidelines: A pilot study

Ivett Quiñones-Uriostegui  1 , Aldo Alessi-Montero  1 , Virginia Bueyes-Roiz  1 , Lidia Nuñez-Carrera  1 , Ana Moreno-Hernández  1 , Jimena Quinzaños-Fresnedo  2 , Gerardo Rodríguez-Reyes  3
Affiliations

Wheelchair users' satisfaction after provision using the WHO 8-step guidelines: A pilot study

Ivett Quiñones-Uriostegui et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Wheelchairs are vital for the successful rehabilitation and inclusion of people with mobility disabilities; 10% of the population with disabilities needs a wheelchair, but only 15% have access to an adequate one. Not user-configured wheelchairs may lead to postural deformities and pressure ulcers, thus negatively impact user satisfaction, wheelchair skills, and quality of life.

Objective: To assess the impact of the 8-step "Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less-resourced settings" from the World Health Organization (WHO) on user satisfaction, wheelchair skills, and quality of life of Mexican manual wheelchair users.

Methods: 12 wheelchair users with spinal cord injury that received rehabilitation were recruited. Volunteers were provided a wheelchair and cushion following the WHO 8-step guidelines. Assessment of QUEST, WHOQOL-Bref, and WST-Q was performed at the beginning of the study and 12 months later.

Results: Significant improvement was observed in terms of satisfaction (QUEST; P = 0.009) after receiving the wheelchair and the foam cushion (QUEST; P = 0.004). WHOQol-Bref did not denote significant differences. For the dimensions assessed by the WST-Q scores, a significant 10.9% improvement was observed in both, capacity (P = 0.022) and performance (P = 0.009).

Conclusions: The application of the WHO 8-step guidelines for wheelchair provision may contribute to increase user satisfaction regarding the wheelchair and cushion devices as well as the prescription process as determined by the QUEST. According to the WST-Q, functional capacity and mobility may also be improved by following the 8-step guidelines.

Keywords: QUEST; Quality of life; User satisfaction; WHO 8-step guidelines for wheelchair provision; Wheelchair prescription.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Wheelchair provision model applied (includes the implementation of the WHO 8-step guidelines.). Each participant was admitted to the rehabilitation unit to receive medical attention or follow-up, as part of the comprehensive rehabilitation program (of whom the wheelchair provision model is part).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Physical, psychological, social and environmental dimension of the WHOQol-Bref.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The proportion of responses to the first two items of the WHOQoL-Bref before and after intervention.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Borg J, Östergren PO, Larsson S, Rahman AA, Bari N, Khan AN.. Assistive technology use is associated with reduced capability poverty: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(2):112–121. - PubMed
    1. United Nations . Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. Treaty series. New York: United Nations; 2006.
    1. Skempes D, Stucki G, Bickenbach J.. Health-related rehabilitation and human rights: analyzing states’ obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:163–173. - PubMed
    1. Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman LA, Scherer JV.. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1321–1331. - PubMed
    1. Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F.. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:1–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources