Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Aug;24(3):361-374.
doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01136-2. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

Comparing the effect of individual and group cognitive-motor training on reconstructing subjective well-being and quality of life in older males, recovered from the COVID-19

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing the effect of individual and group cognitive-motor training on reconstructing subjective well-being and quality of life in older males, recovered from the COVID-19

Amin Amini et al. Cogn Process. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

While the message emanating from physiological and psychological research has extolled the general advantages of exercise in physical and cognitive health, the social distancing and the impossibility of group exercises have revealed more complex conditions. Therefore, we performed an experimental study comparing the effect of individual and group cognitive-motor training on reconstructing subjective well-being (SWB) and quality of life (QOL) in older males who recovered from COVID-19. The study's design is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT). The participants, 36 older men (65-80 yrs.) recovering from COVID-19, were randomly divided into (1) Group A (cognitive-motor training, G-CMT); (2) Group B (individual cognitive-motor training, I-CMT); and (3) Group C (control). Both training interventions involved performing a training protocol (cognitive-motor training) twice a week for four weeks. The outcomes included an assessment of the SWB and QOL of participants by SWB scale and world health organization QOL scale at baseline and two weeks after interventions. Except for the effect of age and number of children variables on QOL, other demographic variables had no significant effect on the results of SWB or WHOQOL of participants (P > 0.05). The SWB results in G-CMT were better than I-CMT and control groups in emotional and social well-being domains. Also, WHOQOL test results in G-CMT were better than control groups in domains of psychological and social relationships, whereas I-CMT performed better than G-CMT and control groups in domains of cognitive well-being, physical health, and environment. The results revealed that the mean test scores of SWB and WHOQOL in G-CMT and I-CMT were better than the control group (P ≤ 0.001). The positive effects of cognitive-motor training on reconstructing SWB and QOL are associated with the synchronicity of cognitive and motor components in these exercises. We suggest that the emotional, social, and psychological benefits of cognitive-motor training override cognitive, physical, and environmental changes. The future line of the present study will include pathophysiology and further clinical aspect of recovering from COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19; Cognitive health; Elderly; Group training; Individual training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare relevant to this article's content.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Profiles of the stages of this study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The cognitive-motor training scenario considered in this study (The training program used progressive activities related to body stability, body stability plus hand manipulation, then body transport, and finally body transport plus hand manipulation. The participants receiving dual-task training with fixed-priority instructions practiced motor tasks while simultaneously performing cognitive tasks, and were instructed to maintain attention on both postural and cognitive tasks at all times.)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparing the effect of individual and group cognitive-motor training on reconstructing SWB
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparing the effect of individual and group cognitive-motor training on reconstructing QOL

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al Dhaheri AS, Bataineh MAF, Mohamad MN, Ajab A, Al Marzouqi A, Jarrar AH, Cheikh Ismail L. Impact of COVID-19 on mental health and quality of life: Is there any effect? A cross-sectional study of the MENA region. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0249107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249107. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alonso-Lana S, Marquié M, Ruiz A, Boada M. Cognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 and effects on elderly individuals with dementia [review] Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12(369):588872. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.588872. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrade C, Radhakrishnan R. The prevention and treatment of cognitive decline and dementia: An overview of recent research on experimental treatments. Indian J Psychiatry. 2009;51(1):12–25. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.44900. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bianchetti A, Rozzini R, Guerini F, Boffelli S, Ranieri P, Minelli G, Trabucchi M. Clinical presentation of COVID19 in dementia patients. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24:560–562. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1389-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bisson E, Contant B, Sveistrup H, Lajoie Y. Functional balance and dual-task reaction times in older adults are improved by virtual reality and biofeedback training. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10(1):16–23. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9997. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types