Completeness and Factors Affecting Community Workers' Reporting of Births and Deaths in the Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action in Mozambique

Abstract

Since March 2018, the Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action project, implemented as a national sample registration system by the Mozambique Instituto Nacional de Saude and the Instituto Nacional de Estatistica in 700 geographic clusters randomly distributed across the 11 provinces, has trained and deployed community surveillance agents (CSAs) to report births and deaths in each cluster prospectively. An independent, retrospective data collection was conducted to assess the completeness of surveillance data. Record linkage procedures were used to match households and vital events reported in the two data sources. We calculated birth and death reporting rates and used a regression model to determine factors associated with the likelihood of vital events being reported by the CSAs. Between March 2018 and December 2019, CSAs reported 54% of births (8,787/16,421) and 45% of deaths (1,726/3,867). Births of smaller cluster sizes (< 1,000 people) were more likely to be reported (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.15-1.83) compared with those of larger cluster sizes (> 1,500 people). Deaths of rural clusters were more likely to be reported (aOR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.07-1.85) than those of urban clusters. Adult deaths were more likely to be reported (aOR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.10-2.02) than child deaths. Our findings suggest that a fully functioning sample vital registration system must adopt a dual system with high-quality surveys or other ways to estimate underregistration periodically, consider a smaller cluster size manageable by a community worker, and pay special attention to urban clusters as underreporting is larger.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of data obtained from the Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action (COMSA) assessment survey in 2020.