Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 May 1;109(5):1330-1341.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000370.

Impact of HER2 on prognosis and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III gastric cancer patients: a multicenter observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Impact of HER2 on prognosis and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III gastric cancer patients: a multicenter observational study

Xianchun Gao et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a well-developed therapeutic target in breast and gastric cancer (GC). However, the impact of HER2 on survival and benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear in patients with GC.

Materials and methods: This multicenter cohort study involved 5622 consecutive stage II/III GC patients. HER2 expression was assessed prospectively via immunohistochemistry (IHC). The staining intensity was graded on a scale of 0 to 3+. An IHC score of 2+or 3+was defined as high expression, and a score of 3+was defined as overexpression.

Results: HER2 overexpression was independently associated with a lower 5-year overall survival (OS) in stage II [hazard ratio (HR), 2.10; 95% CI: 1.41-3.11], but not in stage III GC (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.82-1.20). Further analysis revealed that stage II patients with high HER2 expression showed a poorer response to chemotherapy than stage II patients with low HER2 expression ( Pinteraction =0.024). The HRs for 5-year OS were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.38-0.70) for stage II patients with low HER2 expression, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.51-0.66) for stage III patients with low HER2 expression, 1.13 (95% CI, 0.61-2.09) for stage II patients with high HER2 expression, and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.36-0.61) for stage III patients with high HER2 expression.

Conclusions: Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy is insufficient for stage II GC patients with high HER2 expression, indicating that prospective trials are required to validate alternative HER2-targeted adjuvant therapies in the individuals above.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design and prognostic value of HER2 expression. (A) Study profile; (B–D) Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival according to HER2 expression in patients with stages II and III disease (B), patients with stage II disease (C), and patients with stage III disease (D). HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between HER2 status and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. (A) Stage II subgroup with low HER2 expression [immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores of 0/1+]; (B) stage III subgroup with low HER2 expression; (C) stage II subgroup with high HER2 expression (IHC scores of 2/3+); (D) stage III subgroup with high HER2 expression; (E) treatment interaction with HER2 expression for 5-year overall survival. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between HER2 status and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the stage II subgroup. (A) Stage II subgroup with a HER2 expression score of 0; (B) stage II subgroup with a HER2 expression score of 1+; (C) stage II subgroup with a HER2 expression score of 2+; (D) stage II subgroup with a HER2 expression score of 3+. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between HER2 expression and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in different cohorts. The association between HER2 expression and overall survival was investigated in the internal data set (A) and external data set (B). HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relationship between the number of adjuvant chemotherapy drugs and overall survival in the stage II patients, stratified by HER2 expression. (A) Overall survival in stage II patients with a HER2 IHC score of 0; (B) overall survival in stage II patients with a HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+; (C) overall survival in stage II patients with a HER2 IHC score of 2+; (D) overall survival in stage II patients with a HER2 IHC score of 3+. *Received single-agent chemotherapy versus no adjuvant chemotherapy; #Received multiagent chemotherapy versus no adjuvant chemotherapy. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio.

References

    1. Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001;2:127–137. - PubMed
    1. Oh DY, Bang YJ. HER2-targeted therapies – a role beyond breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020;17:33–48. - PubMed
    1. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, et al. . Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:687–697. - PubMed
    1. Janjigian YY, Kawazoe A, Yanez P, et al. . The KEYNOTE-811 trial of dual PD-1 and HER2 blockade in HER2-positive gastric cancer. Nature 2021;600:727–730. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu Z, Shi M, Li X, et al. . HER2 copy number as predictor of disease-free survival in HER2-positive resectable gastric adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021;147:1315–1324. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types