Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 10;13(1):5847.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32521-8.

Altered brain structural and functional connectivity in cannabis users

Affiliations

Altered brain structural and functional connectivity in cannabis users

Najme Soleimani et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Cannabis is one of the most used and commodified illicit substances worldwide, especially among young adults. The neurobiology mechanism of cannabis is yet to be identified particularly in youth. The purpose of this study was to concurrently measure alterations in brain structural and functional connectivity in cannabis users using resting-state functional magnetic resonance images (rs-fMRI) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) from a group of 73 cannabis users (age 22-36, 19 female) in comparison with 73 healthy controls (age 22-36, 14 female) from Human Connectome Project (HCP). Several significant differences were observed in local structural/functional network measures (e.g. degree and clustering coefficient), being prominent in the insular and frontal opercular cortex and lateral/medial temporal cortex. The rich-club organization of structural networks revealed a normal trend, distributed within bilateral frontal, temporal and occipital regions. However, minor differences were found between the two groups in the superior and inferior temporal gyri. Functional rich-club nodes were mostly located within parietal and posterior areas, with minor differences between the groups found mainly in the centro-temporal and parietal regions. Regional network measures of structural/functional networks were associated with times used cannabis (TUC) in several regions. Although the structural/functional network in both groups showed small-world property, no differences between cannabis users and healthy controls were found regarding the global network measures, showing no association with cannabis use. After FDR correction, all of the significant associations between network measures and TUC were found to be insignificant, except for the association between degree and TUC within the presubiculum region. To recap, our findings revealed alterations in local topological properties of structural and functional networks in cannabis users, although their global brain network organization remained intact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Processing pipeline for brain structural and functional Network Analysis. A structural connectome was constructed for each individual using fiber tractography and a parcellation scheme. A functional connectome was also constructed for each individual by calculating the pairwise Pearson's correlation coefficient of the average time courses of 379 regions. A graph-theoretical analysis was then performed to investigate the topological properties and rich-club organization of the structural and functional brain networks in both healthy controls and cannabis users.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regions showing differences in degree and clustering coefficient between cannabis users and healthy controls in (a) structural networks and (b) functional networks. The color of nodes indicates significant increases (red) or decreases (blue) in degree and clustering coefficient for cannabis users (CB) compared to healthy controls (HC). The size of nodes represents between group differences with p < 0.05, p < 0.02, p < 0.01 and p < 0.005 (uncorrected) with larger nodes showing smaller p values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rich club organization of (a) structural networks and (b) functional networks for cannabis users and healthy controls. The common rich club nodes in two groups are shown in blue. Few rich club nodes were only found for healthy controls (in red) or cannabis users (in green).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Regions showing significant association with times used cannabis in (a) structural and (b) functional networks. Nodes in red and blue show a negative (NEG) and positive (POS) association with times used cannabis, respectively. The node size represents the significant level (p < 0.05, p < 0.02, p < 0.01 and p < 0.005, uncorrected) with larger nodes showing smaller p values. After FDR correction, only the PreS region was found to be statistically significant.

References

    1. Petker, T. et al. Cannabis Involvement and Neuropsychological Performance : Findings from the Human Connectome Project 1–9 (2019). 10.1503/jpn.180115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mercuri K, Terrett G, Henry JD, Curran HV, Elliott M, Rendell PG. Episodic foresight deficits in regular, but not recreational, cannabis users. J. Psychopharmacol. 2018;32(8):876–882. doi: 10.1177/0269881118776672. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Filbey FM, et al. Long-term effects of marijuana use on the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111(47):16913–16918. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415297111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chye Y, Kirkham R, Lorenzetti V, McTavish E, Solowij N, Yücel M. Cannabis, cannabinoids, and brain morphology: A review of the evidence. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging. 2020;1–9:2020. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.07.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tzilos GK, et al. Lack of hippocampal volume change in long-term heavy cannabis users. Am. J. Addict. 2005;14(1):64–72. doi: 10.1080/10550490590899862. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types