Measurement of Perceived Risk of Developing Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Literature Review
- PMID: 37037984
- PMCID: PMC10272015
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08164-w
Measurement of Perceived Risk of Developing Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Background: This systematic review describes approaches to measuring perceived risk of developing type 2 diabetes among individuals without diagnoses and describes the use of theories, models, and frameworks in studies assessing perceived risk. While a systematic review has synthesized perceived risk of complications among individuals with diabetes, no reviews have systematically assessed how perceived risk is measured among those without a diagnosis.
Methods: Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHAL databases were searched for studies conducted through October 2022 with measures of perceived risk among adults ≥ 18 years without a diabetes diagnosis. Extracted data included study characteristics, measures, and health behavior theories, models, or frameworks used.
Results: Eighty-six studies met inclusion criteria. Six examined perceived risk scales' psychometric properties. Eighty measured perceived risk using (1) a single item; (2) a composite score from multiple items or subconstructs; and (3) multiple subconstructs but no composite score. Studies used items measuring "comparative risk," "absolute or lifetime risk," and "perceived risk" without defining how each differed. Sixty-four studies used cross-sectional designs. Twenty-eight studies mentioned use of health behavior theories in study design or selection of measures.
Discussion: There was heterogeneity in how studies operationalized perceived risk; only one third of studies referenced a theory, model, or framework as guiding design or scale and item selection. Use of perceived lifetime risk, absolute risk, or comparative risk limits comparisons across studies. Consideration of context, target population, and how data are utilized is important when selecting measures; we present a series of questions to ask when selecting measures for use in research and clinical settings. This review is the first to categorize how perceived risk is measured in the diabetes prevention domain; most literature focuses on perceived risk among those with diabetes diagnoses. Limitations include exclusion of non-English and gray literature and single reviewer screening and data extraction.
Keywords: Diabetes; Health behavior theory; Perceived risk; Perceived susceptibility.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Published 2022. Accessed November 13, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html
-
- Knowler W, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler S, et al. Reduction in the incidence of Type 2 Diabetes with lifestyle intervention or Metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6). www.nejm.org - PMC - PubMed
-
- Skinner C, Tiro J, Champion VL. The Health Belief Model. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. 5th ed. Jossey-Bass; 2015:75-94.
-
- Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, McCaul KD, Weinstein ND. Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology. Published online 2007. 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136 - PubMed
-
- Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. 5th ed. Jossey-Bass; 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
