Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun;44(5):996-1002.
doi: 10.1007/s00246-023-03153-6. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

Grafts and Patches: Optimized but Not Optimal Materials for Congenital Heart Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Grafts and Patches: Optimized but Not Optimal Materials for Congenital Heart Surgery

Armin Darius Peivandi et al. Pediatr Cardiol. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

A variety of materials are available for the surgery of children with congenital heart defects. In addition to growth-related mismatch, degeneration of the material in particular frequently leads to reoperation. Therefore, the choice of conduits and patches should be made carefully. This article provides an overview of the most commonly implanted materials in pediatric cardiac surgery.Structural changes can be detected in all available materials. Depending on the age at implantation and the site of implantation, the extent and time course of material degeneration vary. Autologous material is still the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Biological materials have largely replaced artificial materials in clinical use.The search for the ideal material continues. In pediatric cardiac surgery, there are only optimized but no optimal materials.

Keywords: Conduit; Congenital heart surgery; Patch.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Strongest, already macroscopically visible, calcifications in explants: A: Contegra® graft; B: homograft
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A: Inflammation in the context of endocarditis of a Contegra.® graft (EvG staining). B: Selective visualization of calcification of a homograft (Alizarin red staining)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Degeneration (loosened tissue, reduced number of elastic fibers and partially destroyed collagen network) caused by the production process: top: native jugular vein of a young bull with intact birefringence in polarization image (right image) and bottom: Contegra.® graft with significantly reduced birefringence (right image: polarization)

References

    1. Lü WD, Zhang M, Wu ZS, Hu TH. Decellularized and photooxidatively crosslinked bovine jugular veins as potential tissue engineering scaffolds. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8:301–305. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.194076. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindinger A, Schwedler G, Hense HW. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in newborns in Germany: results of the first registration year of the PAN Study (July 2006 to June 2007) Klin Padiatr. 2010;222:321–326. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1254155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peivandi AD, Seiler M, Mueller KM, Martens S, et al. Elastica degeneration and intimal hyperplasia lead to Contegra® conduit failure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56:1154–1161. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz199. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schoenhoff FS, Loup O, Gahl B, et al. The Contegra bovine jugular vein graft versus the Shelhigh pulmonic porcine graft for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract: a comparative study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:654–661. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.06.068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diller GP, Orwat S, Vahle J, et al. German competence network for congenital heart defects investigators. Prediction of prognosis in patients with tetralogy of fallot based on deep learning imaging analysis. Heart. 2020;106:1007–1014. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315962. - DOI - PubMed