Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 11;21(1):77.
doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01571-9.

Viral predation pressure on coral reefs

Affiliations

Viral predation pressure on coral reefs

Cynthia B Silveira et al. BMC Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Predation pressure and herbivory exert cascading effects on coral reef health and stability. However, the extent of these cascading effects can vary considerably across space and time. This variability is likely a result of the complex interactions between coral reefs' biotic and abiotic dimensions. A major biological component that has been poorly integrated into the reefs' trophic studies is the microbial community, despite its role in coral death and bleaching susceptibility. Viruses that infect bacteria can control microbial densities and may positively affect coral health by controlling microbialization. We hypothesize that viral predation of bacteria has analogous effects to the top-down pressure of macroorganisms on the trophic structure and reef health.

Results: Here, we investigated the relationships between live coral cover and viruses, bacteria, benthic algae, fish biomass, and water chemistry in 110 reefs spanning inhabited and uninhabited islands and atolls across the Pacific Ocean. Statistical learning showed that the abundance of turf algae, viruses, and bacteria, in that order, were the variables best predicting the variance in coral cover. While fish biomass was not a strong predictor of coral cover, the relationship between fish and corals became apparent when analyzed in the context of viral predation: high coral cover (> 50%) occurred on reefs with a combination of high predator fish biomass (sum of sharks and piscivores > 200 g m-2) and high virus-to-bacteria ratios (> 10), an indicator of viral predation pressure. However, these relationships were non-linear, with reefs at the higher and lower ends of the coral cover continuum displaying a narrow combination of abiotic and biotic variables, while reefs at intermediate coral cover showed a wider range of parameter combinations.

Conclusions: The results presented here support the hypothesis that viral predation of bacteria is associated with high coral cover and, thus, coral health and stability. We propose that combined predation pressures from fishes and viruses control energy fluxes, inhibiting the detrimental accumulation of ecosystem energy in the microbial food web.

Keywords: Bacteriophages; Benthic cover; Coral cover; Fish biomass; Microbialization; Phase-shift.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Benthic cover, fish biomass, and microbial abundances at mid-depth (10–15 m) on 110 coral reef communities across the Pacific. A Percentage of benthos covered by live scleractinian corals. B Fish biomass, as the sum of herbivores, planktivores, invertivores, piscivores, and sharks. C Abundance of microbial cells in the water overlying the reef benthos (within 30 cm). D Relationship between the percentage of the benthos covered by fleshy algae, as a sum of turf algae and fleshy macroalgae, and the percentage of the benthos covered by scleractinian corals, where the dotted line indicates a proportionally inverse relationship summing up to 100%, and the solid line indicates a non-linear fit. E Relationship between total fish biomass and coral cover. F Relationship between viral abundances and microbial cell abundances, where the dotted line indicates a 10:1 relationship and the solid line indicates a linear regression in the log–log plot. The benthic, fish, and bacterial data were obtained concurrently at the same sites visited during the NOAA Pacific Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Variable importance from random forests. A Variable importance in the random forest model including all benthic, fish, microbial, and water chemistry variables. B Variable importance in independent random forests for inhabited (yellow) and uninhabited (orange) sites. In A, purple bars indicate variables with p-value < 0.05 in the permutation test, while gray bars indicate p-values > 0.05. Stars indicate the p-values in the random forest permutation test (***p-value < 0.001, **p-value < 0.01, *p-value < 0.05). Light purple indicates variables removed by the conditional random forests
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationship between microbial and fish predators across the coral cover gradient. A Thin plate spline surface prediction with robust smoothing of the relationship between microbial cell abundance, viral abundance, and coral cover. B Surface prediction of the relationship between the virus-to-bacteria ratio (VBR), the biomass of predator fish, and coral cover by robust smoothing using a thin plate spline. C Effective degrees of freedom across quantiles of coral cover obtained from the cubic smoothing splines
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Conceptual figure illustrating the relationship between predation pressure by viruses, fish predators, and coral cover. Each panel indicates the reef components with the highest importance in uninhabited (top) and inhabited (bottom) reefs according to the statistical learning approach, in addition to their relationships. Asterisks indicate the significance of each variable in the Random Forest model (***p-value < 0.001, **p-value < 0.01, *p-value < 0.05). Abiotic variables (DIC and alkalinity) were omitted from the figure for simplicity. The phage icon indicates viral predation pressure, not abundance. For a legend of the fish icons, please see Fig. 2

References

    1. Cinner JE, Zamborain-Mason J, Gurney GG, Graham NAJ, MacNeil MA, Hoey AS, et al. Meeting fisheries, ecosystem function, and biodiversity goals in a human-dominated world. Science. 2020;368:307–311. doi: 10.1126/science.aax9412. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knowlton N, Rohwer F. Multispecies microbial mutualisms on coral reefs: the host as a habitat. Am Nat. 2003;162:51–62. doi: 10.1086/378684. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silveira C, Cavalcanti G, Walter J, Silva-Lima A, Dinsdale E, Bourne D, et al. Microbial processes driving coral reef organic carbon flow. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017;41:575–595. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moberg F, Folke C. Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecol Econ. 1999;29:215–233. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00009-9. - DOI
    1. Birkeland C. Life and death of coral reefs. New York: Springer New York; 1997.

Publication types