'Family court…sucks out your soul': Australian general practitioners' experiences supporting domestic violence survivors through family court
- PMID: 37038128
- PMCID: PMC10088109
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02044-2
'Family court…sucks out your soul': Australian general practitioners' experiences supporting domestic violence survivors through family court
Abstract
Background: Domestic violence is a significant public health issue with survivors experiencing short- and long-term physical, sexual and psychological health issues. Given this, survivors of domestic violence use healthcare services at an increased rate compared to the general population. Therefore, general practitioners (GPs) are well placed to support survivors of domestic violence. However, many practitioners do not feel ready to address this complex issue of domestic violence. Further, there is no research exploring GPs' role in supporting families through family court in the context of domestic violence.
Methods: This study used qualitative methods. Fifteen GPs participated in individual in-depth interviews. The interviews were audio recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.
Results: The majority of participants were female GPs working in metropolitan settings. Four themes were generated from the data: on different planets, witnessing legal systems abuse, weaponizing mental health in family court and swinging allegiances. Participants had negative perceptions of family court and felt that it operated on a different paradigm to that of general practice which caused difficulties when supporting patients. Participants supported survivors through instances where the court was used by perpetrators to further their abusive behaviour or where the court acted abusively against survivors. In particular, perpetrators and the family court used survivors' mental health against them in court proceedings, which resulted in survivors being reluctant to receive treatment for their mental health. Participants struggled with their allegiances within their patient family and usually opted to support either the mother, the father, or the children.
Conclusions: Implications of these findings for GP training are evident, including curriculum that discusses the intersection of mental health diagnoses and legal proceedings. There may also be a place for health justice partnerships within general practice.
Keywords: Domestic violence; Family court; Intimate partner violence; Primary care.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Firearms and post-separation abuse: Providing context behind the data on firearms and intimate partner violence.J Adv Nurs. 2024 Apr;80(4):1484-1496. doi: 10.1111/jan.15933. Epub 2023 Nov 3. J Adv Nurs. 2024. PMID: 37921256 Free PMC article.
-
General practice clinicians' perspectives on involving and supporting children and adult perpetrators in families experiencing domestic violence and abuse.Fam Pract. 2015 Dec;32(6):701-5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv070. Epub 2015 Sep 10. Fam Pract. 2015. PMID: 26358011
-
Knowledge and practices of regional and rural general practitioners in the identification and management of intimate partner and family violence: a mixed methods study in Western Australia.BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 11;26(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02754-9. BMC Prim Care. 2025. PMID: 40069624 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact on Informal Supporters of Domestic Violence Survivors: A Systematic Literature Review.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017 Dec;18(5):562-580. doi: 10.1177/1524838016641919. Epub 2016 Apr 10. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017. PMID: 27066990
-
What is the role of health systems in responding to domestic violence? An evidence review.Aust Health Rev. 2017 Dec;41(6):639-645. doi: 10.1071/AH16155. Aust Health Rev. 2017. PMID: 28104041 Review.
Cited by
-
Motivations, barriers and enablers for medical and forensic examiners in New South Wales sexual assault services: a qualitative interview study.Med J Aust. 2025 Jul 21;223(2):85-91. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52679. Epub 2025 May 23. Med J Aust. 2025. PMID: 40406807 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013.
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia 2018. Cat. No. FDV 2. Canberra: AIHW; 2018.
-
- Hegarty K, McKenzie M, McLindon E, Addison M, Valpied J, Hameed M, Kyei-Onanjiri M, Baloch S, Diemer K, Tarzia L. (2022). “I just felt like I was running around in a circle”: Listening to the voices of victims and perpetrators to transform responses to intimate partner violence (Research report, 22/2022). ANROWS.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources