Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 11;20(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01169-w.

Generative adversarial networks in EEG analysis: an overview

Affiliations
Review

Generative adversarial networks in EEG analysis: an overview

Ahmed G Habashi et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals have been utilized in a variety of medical as well as engineering applications. However, one of the challenges associated with recording EEG data is the difficulty of recording large amounts of data. Consequently, data augmentation is a potential solution to overcome this challenge in which the objective is to increase the amount of data. Inspired by the success of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in image processing applications, generating artificial EEG data from the limited recorded data using GANs has seen recent success. This article provides an overview of various techniques and approaches of GANs for augmenting EEG signals. We focus on the utility of GANs in different applications including Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) paradigms such as motor imagery and P300-based systems, in addition to emotion recognition, epileptic seizures detection and prediction, and various other applications. We address in this article how GANs have been used in each study, the impact of using GANs on the model performance, the limitations of each algorithm, and future possibilities for developing new algorithms. We emphasize the utility of GANs in augmenting the limited EEG data typically available in the studied applications.

Keywords: EEG; Emotion recognition; Epilepsy; GAN; Motor imagery; P300.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
GAN architecture
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Paper selection criteria

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biasiucci A, Franceschiello B, Murray MM. Electroencephalography. Curr Biol. 2019;29:R80–R85. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McFarland DJ, Wolpaw JR. EEG-based brain–computer interfaces. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017;4:194–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2017.11.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jas M, Engemann DA, Bekhti Y, Raimondo F, Gramfort A. Autoreject: automated artifact rejection for MEG and EEG data. Neuroimage. 2017;159:417–429. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lotte F, Congedo M, Lécuyer A, Lamarche F, Arnaldi B. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces. J Neural Eng. 2007;4:R1. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/R01. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shin Y, Lee S, Ahn M, Cho H, Jun SC, Lee HN. Noise robustness analysis of sparse representation-based classification method for non-stationary EEG signal classification. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2015;21:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2015.05.007. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources