Evaluating a novel intervention in undergraduate medicine: an MBBS Curriculum Map

Abstract

Background: Following student feedback, a Curriculum Map (CM) was commissioned in 2018 at UCL Medical School (UCLMS). After exploring key requirements of a CM, the second phase focused on building a prototype before its launch. This study evaluates this novel pedagogical intervention following its implementation, from the perspective of its primary users, UCL medical students.

Methods: This multi-method study was conducted two months after the CM's launch in 2019. Quantitative and qualitative data was gathered via a survey and focus groups across four domains: usefulness, satisfaction, appearance, and content. Reflective Thematic Analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data to build themes.

Results: One hundred ninety five participants (195/1347, 14%) responded to the survey and two focus groups were held. Higher rates of satisfaction were seen among later years compared to early years students. Five key themes emerged on the CM as a: UCLMS textbook; learning aid for assessments; tool for capturing scientific content; modern learning technology and tool for 'levelling the playing field'. Key findings suggest that while students welcomed a centralised resource to create transparency, there were clear differences between early and later years students, with the former preferring a more prescriptive approach. Learning was assessment-driven across all years and students highlighted their desire for greater clarity on the importance of curricular content for summative assessments.

Conclusion: A CM provides a benchmark for medical educators on the undergraduate curriculum, which must be balanced with its limitations; a CM cannot provide an exhaustive syllabus and needs to be supplemented with self-directed learning and clinical preparation for practice.

Keywords: Curriculum Development; Curriculum Evaluation; Digital Learning; Electronic Curriculum.

Fig. 1

The UCL Medical School MBBS core curriculum during the 2019–20 academic year

Fig. 2

The interface of the 2019-20 MBBS Curriculum Map with the student user selecting Year 4, Module A, and Acute Medicine to show the Intended Learning Outcomes for this specialty

Fig. 3

Survey results for: “How useful do you find the Curriculum Map?” on a Likert scale from “not at all useful” to “extremely useful”. Results have been rounded to the nearest whole number

Fig. 4

Survey results for: “How satisfied are you with the Curriculum Map?” on a Likert scale from “not at all satisfied” to “very satisfied”. Results have been rounded to the nearest whole number