State-specific fertility rate changes across the USA following the first two waves of COVID-19
- PMID: 37038265
- PMCID: PMC10233281
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead055
State-specific fertility rate changes across the USA following the first two waves of COVID-19
Abstract
Study question: How did the first two coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) waves affect fertility rates in the USA?
Summary answer: States differed widely in how their fertility rates changed following the COVID-19 outbreak and these changes were influenced more by state-level economic, racial, political, and social factors than by COVID-19 wave severity.
What is known already: The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to already declining fertility rates in the USA, but not equally across states. Identifying drivers of differential changes in fertility rates can help explain variations in demographic shifts across states in the USA and motivate policies that support families in general, not only during crises.
Study design, size, duration: This is an ecological study using state-level data from 50 US states and the District of Columbia (n = 51). The study period extends from 2020 to 2021 with historical data from 2016 to 2019. We identified Wave 1 as the first apex for each state after February 2020 and Wave 2 as the second apex, during Fall/Winter 2020-2021.
Participants/materials, setting, methods: State-level COVID-19 wave severity, defined as case acceleration during each 3-month COVID-19 wave (cases/100 000 population/month), was derived from 7-day weekly moving average COVID-19 case rates from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). State-level fertility rate changes (change in average monthly fertility rate/100 000 women of reproductive age (WRA)/year) were derived from the CDC Bureau of Vital Statistics and from 2020 US Census and University of Virginia 2021 population estimates 9 months after each COVID-19 wave. We performed univariate analyses to describe national and state-level fertility rate changes following each wave, and simple and multivariable linear regression analyses to assess the relation of COVID-19 wave severity and other state-level characteristics with fertility rate changes.
Main results and the role of chance: Nationwide, fertility dropped by 17.5 births/month/100 000 WRA/year following Wave 1 and 9.2 births/month/100 000 WRA/year following Wave 2. The declines following Wave 1 were largest among majority-Democrat, more non-White states where people practiced greater social distancing. Greater COVID-19 wave severity was associated with steeper fertility rate decline post-Wave 1 in simple regression, but the association was attenuated when adjusted for other covariates. Adjusting for the economic impact of the pandemic (hypothesized mediator) also attenuated the effect. There was no relation between COVID-19 wave severity and fertility rate change following Wave 2.
Limitations, reasons for caution: Our study harnesses state-level data so individual-level conclusions cannot be inferred. There may be residual confounding in our multivariable regression and we were underpowered to detect some effects.
Wider implications of the findings: The COVID-19 pandemic initially impacted the national fertility rate but, overall, the fertility rate rebounded to the pre-pandemic level following Wave 2. Consistent with prior literature, COVID-19 wave severity did not appear to predict fertility rate change. Economic, racial, political, and social factors influenced state-specific fertility rates during the pandemic more than the severity of the outbreak alone. Future studies in other countries should also consider whether these factors account for internal heterogeneity when examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and other crises on fertility.
Study funding/competing interest(s): L.G.K. received funding from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R00ES030403), M.C. from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (20-A0-00-1005789), and M.L. and E.S. from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES032808). None of the authors have competing interests.
Trial registration number: N/A.
Keywords: COVID-19; US state analysis; birth rates; coronavirus disease 2019; ecological study; fertility; fertility trends; pandemic; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; social determinants.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
None to declare.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Birth rate decline in the later phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of policy interventions, vaccination programmes, and economic uncertainty.Hum Reprod Open. 2024 Sep 10;2024(3):hoae052. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae052. eCollection 2024. Hum Reprod Open. 2024. PMID: 39345877 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on birth rates in Europe: a time series analysis in 24 countries.Hum Reprod. 2022 Nov 24;37(12):2921-2931. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac215. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 36228661 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 36966780 Free PMC article.
-
Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study.Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 30. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33272617
-
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on births and induced abortions in Southern Sweden: a register-based study.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jan 6;51(1):9-17. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202162. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 38834283 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of COVID-19 on live birth and perinatal outcomes following subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03573-8. Online ahead of print. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025. PMID: 40815354
-
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination is Not Associated With Involuntary Childlessness in Female Healthcare Workers: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Jun;18(6):e13333. doi: 10.1111/irv.13333. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024. PMID: 38845394 Free PMC article.
-
US Abortion Bans and Fertility.JAMA. 2025 Apr 15;333(15):1324-1332. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.28527. JAMA. 2025. PMID: 39946144 Free PMC article.
-
Human T-lymphotropic virus-1 infection among Latin American pregnant women living in Spain.IJID Reg. 2023 Nov 22;10:146-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.11.010. eCollection 2024 Mar. IJID Reg. 2023. PMID: 38304758 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adolph C, Amano K, Bang-Jensen B, Fullman N, Magistro B, Reinke G, Wilkerson J.. Governor partisanship explains the adoption of statewide mask mandates in response to COVID-19. State Polit Policy Q 2022;22:24–49.
-
- Barroso A. With a Potential ‘Baby Bust’ on the Horizon, Key Facts about Fertility in the U.S. before the Pandemic Birth Rate & Fertility. Washington, DC.: Pew Research Center, 2021.
-
- Brown A. Growing Share of Childless Adults in U.S. Don’t Expect to Ever Have Children Parenthood. Washington, DC.: Pew Research Center, 2021.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous