Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 1;38(6):1202-1212.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead055.

State-specific fertility rate changes across the USA following the first two waves of COVID-19

Affiliations

State-specific fertility rate changes across the USA following the first two waves of COVID-19

Sarah Adelman et al. Hum Reprod. .

Abstract

Study question: How did the first two coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) waves affect fertility rates in the USA?

Summary answer: States differed widely in how their fertility rates changed following the COVID-19 outbreak and these changes were influenced more by state-level economic, racial, political, and social factors than by COVID-19 wave severity.

What is known already: The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to already declining fertility rates in the USA, but not equally across states. Identifying drivers of differential changes in fertility rates can help explain variations in demographic shifts across states in the USA and motivate policies that support families in general, not only during crises.

Study design, size, duration: This is an ecological study using state-level data from 50 US states and the District of Columbia (n = 51). The study period extends from 2020 to 2021 with historical data from 2016 to 2019. We identified Wave 1 as the first apex for each state after February 2020 and Wave 2 as the second apex, during Fall/Winter 2020-2021.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: State-level COVID-19 wave severity, defined as case acceleration during each 3-month COVID-19 wave (cases/100 000 population/month), was derived from 7-day weekly moving average COVID-19 case rates from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). State-level fertility rate changes (change in average monthly fertility rate/100 000 women of reproductive age (WRA)/year) were derived from the CDC Bureau of Vital Statistics and from 2020 US Census and University of Virginia 2021 population estimates 9 months after each COVID-19 wave. We performed univariate analyses to describe national and state-level fertility rate changes following each wave, and simple and multivariable linear regression analyses to assess the relation of COVID-19 wave severity and other state-level characteristics with fertility rate changes.

Main results and the role of chance: Nationwide, fertility dropped by 17.5 births/month/100 000 WRA/year following Wave 1 and 9.2 births/month/100 000 WRA/year following Wave 2. The declines following Wave 1 were largest among majority-Democrat, more non-White states where people practiced greater social distancing. Greater COVID-19 wave severity was associated with steeper fertility rate decline post-Wave 1 in simple regression, but the association was attenuated when adjusted for other covariates. Adjusting for the economic impact of the pandemic (hypothesized mediator) also attenuated the effect. There was no relation between COVID-19 wave severity and fertility rate change following Wave 2.

Limitations, reasons for caution: Our study harnesses state-level data so individual-level conclusions cannot be inferred. There may be residual confounding in our multivariable regression and we were underpowered to detect some effects.

Wider implications of the findings: The COVID-19 pandemic initially impacted the national fertility rate but, overall, the fertility rate rebounded to the pre-pandemic level following Wave 2. Consistent with prior literature, COVID-19 wave severity did not appear to predict fertility rate change. Economic, racial, political, and social factors influenced state-specific fertility rates during the pandemic more than the severity of the outbreak alone. Future studies in other countries should also consider whether these factors account for internal heterogeneity when examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and other crises on fertility.

Study funding/competing interest(s): L.G.K. received funding from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R00ES030403), M.C. from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (20-A0-00-1005789), and M.L. and E.S. from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES032808). None of the authors have competing interests.

Trial registration number: N/A.

Keywords: COVID-19; US state analysis; birth rates; coronavirus disease 2019; ecological study; fertility; fertility trends; pandemic; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; social determinants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Calculation of annual change in average monthly fertility rate for New York and Rhode Island following COVID-19 waves. Each panel represents the fertility rate (average monthly births/100 000 women of reproductive age) in the 9 months following each coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave compared to the fertility rate in the same months in previous years (1 year prior for Wave 1, 2 years prior for Wave 2). The dotted lines show the mean fertility rate for each period. The vertical black lines indicate the annual (Wave 1) or biannual (Wave 2) average monthly fertility rate change.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
State-specific annual fertility rate change for pre-pandemic period, post-Wave 1 and post-Wave 2 for each US state. The top map of the USA shows state-specific annual change in fertility rate (average monthly births/100 000 women of reproductive age) pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) (averaged from 2016 to 2019). The middle and bottom map shows the state-specific annual change in fertility rate following Wave 1 and Wave 2, respectively.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Annual fertility rate change in the USA in relation to social distancing index and political leaning following Wave 1. Following Wave 1, fertility rate change is correlated with Social Distancing Index (x-axis) and political leaning (red: Republican, blue; Democrat). Social Distancing Index is a scale from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating greater levels of social distancing. Political leaning is the percentage of the state that voted Republican in the 2020 election. The size of the point indicates the number of women of reproductive age in that state during 2020.

Similar articles

  • Birth rate decline in the later phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of policy interventions, vaccination programmes, and economic uncertainty.
    Winkler-Dworak M, Zeman K, Sobotka T. Winkler-Dworak M, et al. Hum Reprod Open. 2024 Sep 10;2024(3):hoae052. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae052. eCollection 2024. Hum Reprod Open. 2024. PMID: 39345877 Free PMC article.
  • Impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on birth rates in Europe: a time series analysis in 24 countries.
    Pomar L, Favre G, de Labrusse C, Contier A, Boulvain M, Baud D. Pomar L, et al. Hum Reprod. 2022 Nov 24;37(12):2921-2931. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac215. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 36228661 Free PMC article.
  • Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.
    Bollyky TJ, Castro E, Aravkin AY, Bhangdia K, Dalos J, Hulland EN, Kiernan S, Lastuka A, McHugh TA, Ostroff SM, Zheng P, Chaudhry HT, Ruggiero E, Turilli I, Adolph C, Amlag JO, Bang-Jensen B, Barber RM, Carter A, Chang C, Cogen RM, Collins JK, Dai X, Dangel WJ, Dapper C, Deen A, Eastus A, Erickson M, Fedosseeva T, Flaxman AD, Fullman N, Giles JR, Guo G, Hay SI, He J, Helak M, Huntley BM, Iannucci VC, Kinzel KE, LeGrand KE, Magistro B, Mokdad AH, Nassereldine H, Ozten Y, Pasovic M, Pigott DM, Reiner RC Jr, Reinke G, Schumacher AE, Serieux E, Spurlock EE, Troeger CE, Vo AT, Vos T, Walcott R, Yazdani S, Murray CJL, Dieleman JL. Bollyky TJ, et al. Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 36966780 Free PMC article.
  • Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study.
    Duffy JMN, Adamson GD, Benson E, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya S, Bofill M, Brian K, Collura B, Curtis C, Evers JLH, Farquharson RG, Fincham A, Franik S, Giudice LC, Glanville E, Hickey M, Horne AW, Hull ML, Johnson NP, Jordan V, Khalaf Y, Knijnenburg JML, Legro RS, Lensen S, MacKenzie J, Mavrelos D, Mol BW, Morbeck DE, Nagels H, Ng EHY, Niederberger C, Otter AS, Puscasiu L, Rautakallio-Hokkanen S, Sadler L, Sarris I, Showell M, Stewart J, Strandell A, Strawbridge C, Vail A, van Wely M, Vercoe M, Vuong NL, Wang AY, Wang R, Wilkinson J, Wong K, Wong TY, Farquhar CM; Priority Setting Partnership for Infertility. Duffy JMN, et al. Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 30. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33272617
  • The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ, Raps H, Cropper M, Bald C, Brunner M, Canonizado EM, Charles D, Chiles TC, Donohue MJ, Enck J, Fenichel P, Fleming LE, Ferrier-Pages C, Fordham R, Gozt A, Griffin C, Hahn ME, Haryanto B, Hixson R, Ianelli H, James BD, Kumar P, Laborde A, Law KL, Martin K, Mu J, Mulders Y, Mustapha A, Niu J, Pahl S, Park Y, Pedrotti ML, Pitt JA, Ruchirawat M, Seewoo BJ, Spring M, Stegeman JJ, Suk W, Symeonides C, Takada H, Thompson RC, Vicini A, Wang Z, Whitman E, Wirth D, Wolff M, Yousuf AK, Dunlop S. Landrigan PJ, et al. Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Adolph C, Amano K, Bang-Jensen B, Fullman N, Magistro B, Reinke G, Wilkerson J.. Governor partisanship explains the adoption of statewide mask mandates in response to COVID-19. State Polit Policy Q 2022;22:24–49.
    1. Aitken RJ. The changing tide of human fertility. Hum Reprod 2022;37:629–638. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey MJ, Bart L, Lang VW.. The missing baby bust: the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for contraceptive use, pregnancy, and childbirth among low-income women. Popul Res Policy Rev 2022;41:1549–1569. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barroso A. With a Potential ‘Baby Bust’ on the Horizon, Key Facts about Fertility in the U.S. before the Pandemic Birth Rate & Fertility. Washington, DC.: Pew Research Center, 2021.
    1. Brown A. Growing Share of Childless Adults in U.S. Don’t Expect to Ever Have Children Parenthood. Washington, DC.: Pew Research Center, 2021.

Publication types