Decision-making under uncertainty for species introductions into ecological networks
- PMID: 37038276
- DOI: 10.1111/ele.14212
Decision-making under uncertainty for species introductions into ecological networks
Abstract
Ecological communities are increasingly subject to natural and human-induced additions of species, as species shift their ranges under climate change, are introduced for conservation and are unintentionally moved by humans. As such, decisions about how to manage ecosystems subject to species introductions and considering multiple management objectives need to be made. However, the impacts of gaining new species on ecological communities are difficult to predict due to uncertainty in introduced species characteristics, the novel interactions that will be produced by that species, and the recipient ecosystem structure. Drawing on ecological and conservation decision theory, we synthesise literature into a conceptual framework for species introduction decision-making based on ecological networks in high-uncertainty contexts. We demonstrate the application of this framework to a theoretical decision surrounding assisted migration considering both biodiversity and ecosystem service objectives. We show that this framework can be used to evaluate trade-offs between outcomes, predict worst-case scenarios, suggest when one should collect additional data, and allow for improving knowledge of the system over time.
Keywords: ecological networks; ecosystem services; invasion; link prediction; managed relocation; multiple management objectives; species interactions; species on the move; trade-off analysis.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Systematic planning of disconnection to enhance conservation success in a modified world.Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 1;536:1038-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.120. Epub 2015 Aug 5. Sci Total Environ. 2015. PMID: 26254022
-
Spatial conservation planning under uncertainty: adapting to climate change risks using modern portfolio theory.Ecol Appl. 2019 Oct;29(7):e01962. doi: 10.1002/eap.1962. Epub 2019 Jul 22. Ecol Appl. 2019. PMID: 31243844
-
Analyzing ecosystem services as part of ecological networks in three salt marsh ecosystems.Ecology. 2022 Mar;103(3):e3609. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3609. Epub 2022 Feb 4. Ecology. 2022. PMID: 34913165
-
Ecological forecasts to inform near-term management of threats to biodiversity.Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Oct;26(10):5816-5828. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15272. Epub 2020 Aug 8. Glob Chang Biol. 2020. PMID: 32652624 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Climate change, biotic interactions and ecosystem services.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 12;365(1549):2013-8. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0114. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010. PMID: 20513709 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Optimal timing to estimate moose Alces alces demographic parameters using remote cameras.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05603-y. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40595881 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adams, M.P., Sisson, S.A., Helmstedt, K.J., Baker, C.M., Holden, M.H., Plein, M. et al. (2020) Informing management decisions for ecological networks, using dynamic models calibrated to noisy time-series data. Ecology Letters, 23, 607-619.
-
- Addison, P.F.E., Rumpff, L., Bau, S.S., Carey, J.M., Chee, Y.E., Jarrad, F.C. et al. (2013) Practical solutions for making models indispensable in conservation decision-making. Diversity and Distributions, 19, 490-502.
-
- Allesina, S. & Pascual, M. (2009) Food web models: a plea for groups. Ecology Letters, 12, 652-662.
-
- Armstrong, D. & Seddon, P. (2008) Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 20-25.
-
- Ashander, J., Kroetz, K., Epanchin-Niell, R., Phelps, N.B.D., Haight, R.G. & Dee, L.E. (2022) Guiding large-scale management of invasive species using network metrics. Nature Sustainability, 5, 762-769.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials