An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before
sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal
government site.
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the
official website and that any information you provide is encrypted
and transmitted securely.
Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-23-5/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Comment on
J Spine Surg. 9:39.
References
Woodward J, Koro L, Richards D, et al. Expandable versus Static Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: 1-year Radiographic Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes. World Neurosurg 2022;159:e1-7. 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.056
-
DOI
-
PubMed
Sembrano JN, Horazdovsky RD, Sharma AK, et al. Do Lordotic Cages Provide Better Segmental Lordosis Versus Nonlordotic Cages in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)? Clin Spine Surg 2017;30:E338-43. 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000114
-
DOI
-
PubMed
Macki M, Hamilton T, Haddad YW, et al. Expandable Cage Technology-Transforaminal, Anterior, and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021;21:S69-S80. 10.1093/ons/opaa342
-
DOI
-
PubMed
Godzik J, Lehrman JN, Newcomb AGUS, et al. Tailoring selection of transforaminal interbody spacers based on biomechanical characteristics and surgical goals: evaluation of an expandable spacer. J Neurosurg Spine 2019. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: .10.3171/2019.1.SPINE181008
-
DOI
-
PubMed
de Kunder SL, van Kuijk SMJ, Rijkers K, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J 2017;17:1712-21. 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018
-
DOI
-
PubMed