Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;55(2):80-85.
doi: 10.1363/psrh.12224. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

Characteristics of abortion patients in protected and restricted states accessing clinic-based care 12 months prior to the elimination of the federal constitutional right to abortion in the United States

Rachel K Jones  1 , Doris W Chiu  1
Affiliations

Characteristics of abortion patients in protected and restricted states accessing clinic-based care 12 months prior to the elimination of the federal constitutional right to abortion in the United States

Rachel K Jones et al. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Background: As a result of the June 2022 decision of the United States (US) Supreme Court, as many as 24 states have, or are expected to, ban or severely restrict abortion. We provide baseline information about abortion patients living in different state environments prior to this decision.

Methods: We obtained surveys from 6674 women, transgender men, and other pregnancy capable individuals accessing abortion care at 56 facilities across the US between June 2021 and July 2022. The final analytic sample uses information from 5930 abortion patients to compare the demographic and situational profiles of those living in the 24 states likely to ban abortion (restricted) to those living in states where it is likely to remain legal (protected).

Results: Compared to respondents who lived in protected states, abortion patients in restricted states were more likely to be Black (39% vs. 30%) or white (35% vs. 28%) and less likely to be Latinx (18% vs. 32%). Respondents in restricted states were more likely to be paying out-of-pocket for care (87% vs. 42%), be relying on financial assistance (22% vs. 11%), and indicate that it was difficult to pay for the abortion (54% vs. 28%). Twelve percent of respondents who lived in a restricted state crossed state lines for care and the majority (59%) was going to another restricted state.

Discussion: Prior to June 2022, abortion patients in restricted states encountered more situational and financial barriers compared to those in protected states. These barriers have undoubtedly been exacerbated by abortion bans.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Nash E, Ephross P. State policy trends 2022: In a devastating year, US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe leads to bans, confusion and chaos. 2023 Accessed March 6, 2023. https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/01/eight-ways-state-policymakers-can-pro...
    1. Nash E, Isabel G. Six months post-Roe, 24 US states have banned abortion or are likely to do so: a roundup. 2023 Accessed March 6, 2023. https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/01/six-months-post-roe-24-us-states-have...
    1. Jones RK, Kirstein M, Philbin J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2020. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022;54(4):128-141. doi:10.1363/psrh.12215
    1. Addante AN, Paul R, Dorsey M, McNicholas C, Madden T. Differences in financial and social burdens experienced by patients traveling for abortion care. 2021. Womens Health Issues. 2021;31(5):426-431. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2021.06.002
    1. Sears B, Cohen C, Stemple L. People Traveling to California and Los Angeles for Abortion Care if Roe V. Wade is Overturned. UCLA School of Law Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy; 2022 Accessed March 6, 2022. https://law.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/PDFs/Center_on_Reproductive_Hea...

LinkOut - more resources