Real-time image and time-lapse technology to select the single blastocyst to transfer in assisted reproductive cycles
- PMID: 37039114
- DOI: 10.1017/S0967199423000151
Real-time image and time-lapse technology to select the single blastocyst to transfer in assisted reproductive cycles
Abstract
The success of an assisted reproduction cycle should be the achievement of a healthy singleton live birth following the replacement of one embryo. Therefore, one of the most critical points for embryologists has been the selection criteria and how to choose the best embryo to transfer with high implantation potential. In this vein, morphological evaluation has been historically the method applied. However, this practice relies on a limited number of single observations and is associated with high operator variability. Recently, a major innovation in embryo culture has been the introduction of a new type of incubator with integrated time-lapse monitoring, which enables the embryologist to analyze the dynamic events of embryo development, from fertilization to blastocyst formation. This novel practice is quickly growing and has been implemented in many IVF clinics worldwide. Therefore, the main aim of this review is to illustrate the benefits of time-lapse technology in a modern embryology laboratory. In particular, we discuss the blastocyst collapse(s) event and morphometric blastocyst assessment and analyse their association with embryo viability and implantation potential.
Keywords: Blastocyst collapse; Embryo culture; Morphometric blastocyst assessment; Pregnancy outcome; Single-blastocyst transfer; Time-lapse technology.
Similar articles
-
Focus on time-lapse analysis: blastocyst collapse and morphometric assessment as new features of embryo viability.Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Nov;43(5):821-832. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 16. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021. PMID: 34593324 Review.
-
Use of time-lapse monitoring in medically assisted reproduction treatments: a mini-review.Zygote. 2021 Apr;29(2):93-101. doi: 10.1017/S0967199420000623. Epub 2020 Nov 24. Zygote. 2021. PMID: 33228819 Review.
-
Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2275-2290. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac171. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35944167
-
Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2245-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew183. Epub 2016 Sep 2. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27591227
-
Performance of Day 5 KIDScore™ morphokinetic prediction models of implantation and live birth after single blastocyst transfer.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Nov;36(11):2279-2285. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01567-x. Epub 2019 Aug 23. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019. PMID: 31444634 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Preimplantation development analysis of aneuploid embryos with different chromosomal abnormalities.Heliyon. 2024 Nov 26;10(23):e40686. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40686. eCollection 2024 Dec 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39687119 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Impact of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and Non-Invasive Oocyte Assessment in ART Treatments.Life (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;13(10):1989. doi: 10.3390/life13101989. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37895371 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictive potential of combined secretomics and image-based morphometry as a non-invasive method for selecting implanting embryos.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Apr 12;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01386-z. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40221726 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources