Pelvic Exam Laws in the United States: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 37039755
- DOI: 10.1017/amj.2023.4
Pelvic Exam Laws in the United States: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Laws regulating patient care are an essential component of protecting patients and doctors alike. No studies have previously examined what laws exist regarding pelvic examinations in the United States (US). This study systematically reviews and compares regulation and legislation of pelvic examinations in the U.S. and provides a comprehensive resource to educate clinicians, patients, and lawmakers. Each of the fifty States in the U.S. was included. The primary outcome was existence of any pelvic or rectal exam laws. Data was obtained for the type of examination defined within the law, exceptions to the law, to whom the law applied to, the type of consent required, and to whom the consent applied to. Laws were identified from each of the individual state legislative websites. All sections of each law pertaining to pelvic examination were reviewed and organized by state. Descriptive statistics were performed for each of the variables, including frequencies of each amongst the fifty states. State regulation for pelvic examinations varied from no law or regulation to laws pertaining to pelvic, rectal, prostate, and breast examination performed in any context. As of November 22, 2022, there are twenty states (40%) with pelvic examination laws applying to anesthetized or unconscious patients. Thirteen additional states (26%) have proposed pelvic exam laws. Seventeen states (34%) do not have any laws regarding pelvic examinations. Regulation of pelvic examinations has become an increasingly important issue over the past few years in response to growing concerns of patient autonomy and the ethical issues raised by such sensitive examinations. While pelvic examination laws that balance protection for patient autonomy and the needs of caregivers and educators exist in much of the U.S., more work needs to continue in consultation with physicians and health care providers to ensure that all states have reasonable laws protecting the autonomy of patients while also maintaining quality of care.
Keywords: criminal law; medical education; pelvic exam; women’s health.
Similar articles
-
Not just "bodies with vaginas": A Kantian defense of pelvic exam consent laws.Bioethics. 2022 Nov;36(9):940-947. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13084. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Bioethics. 2022. PMID: 36067372 Free PMC article.
-
Consent for Intimate Exams on Unconscious Patients: Sharpening Legislative Efforts.Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Jan;52(1):28-31. doi: 10.1002/hast.1337. Hastings Cent Rep. 2022. PMID: 35143067
-
Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors.BMC Med Educ. 2016 Dec 16;16(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0835-6. BMC Med Educ. 2016. PMID: 27986086 Free PMC article.
-
Review of United States laws pertaining to the recovery and analysis of human skeletal remains.J Forensic Sci. 2022 Sep;67(5):1876-1889. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15082. Epub 2022 Jul 1. J Forensic Sci. 2022. PMID: 35775200 Review.
-
Addressing Anxiety and Fear during the Female Pelvic Examination.J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:2150132721992195. doi: 10.1177/2150132721992195. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021. PMID: 33525968 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous