Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan;157(1):51-56.
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_759_20.

Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine-fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine-fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group

Tripat Kaur et al. Indian J Med Res. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background & objectives: Intranasal midazolam-fentanyl is commonly used as pre-medication in paediatric patients, but there is a risk of respiratory depression with this combination. Dexmedetomidine is a drug that preserves respiratory function. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgeries.

Methods: Hundred children in the age group of 3-8 yr of American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status grade 1 were randomized into two groups- group A received intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg)-fentanyl (2 μg/kg) and group B received intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg)-fentanyl (2 μg/kg) 20 min before induction of general anaesthesia. Heart rate and SpO2 were monitored. Sedation score, parental separation and response to intravenous cannulation were seen after 20 min. Children were monitored for 2 h for post-operative analgesia by Oucher's Facial Pain Scale.

Results: Sedation scores were satisfactory in both groups, although children in group A were more sedated than in group B. Parental separation and response to intravenous cannulation were comparable in both the groups. The two groups were also haemodynamically comparable intraoperatively. Post-operative heart rate was also comparable at all-time intervals in both the groups except for heart rate at 100 and 120 min which were more in group A. Group A experienced more post-operative pain as assessed by Oucher's Facial Pain Scale as compared to group B. Children receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine-fentanyl had better post-operative analgesia as compared to those who received intranasal midazolam-fentanyl.

Interpretation & conclusions: Both intranasal midazolam with fentanyl and intranasal dexmedetomidine with fentanyl provided satisfactory sedation. Both groups were comparable in separation reaction and response to intravenous cannulation with better post-operative analgesia in children receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine-fentanyl.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; fentanyl; intranasal; midazolam; paediatric; pre-medication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carlsson RNE, Henningsson RN. Visiting the operating theatre before surgery did not reduce the anxiety in children and their attendant parent. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018;38:e24–9. - PubMed
    1. Del Pizzo J, Callahan JM. Intranasal medications in pediatric emergency medicine. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014;30:496–501. - PubMed
    1. Griffin CE, 3rd, Kaye AM, Bueno FR, Kaye AD. Benzodiazepine pharmacology and central nervous system-mediated effects. Ochsner J. 2013;13:214–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grassin-Delyle S, Buenestado A, Naline E, Faisy C, Blouquit-Laye S, Couderc LJ, et al. Intranasal drug delivery: An efficient and non-invasive route for systemic administration: Focus on opioids. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;134:366–79. - PubMed
    1. Kaur M, Singh PM. Current role of dexmedetomidine in clinical anesthesia and intensive care. Anesth Essays Res. 2011;5:128–33. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types