Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):5899.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33173-4.

Validating the APACHE IV score in predicting length of stay in the intensive care unit among patients with sepsis

Affiliations

Validating the APACHE IV score in predicting length of stay in the intensive care unit among patients with sepsis

Kinley Zangmo et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV model can predict the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) in critically ill patients. Thus, this study aimed to validate the performance of the APACHE IV score in predicting ICU LOS among patients with sepsis. This retrospective study was conducted in the medical ICU of a tertiary university between 2017 and 2020. A total of 1,039 sepsis patients were enrolled. Patients with an ICU stay of 1 and > 3 days accounted for 20.1% and 43.9%. The overall observed and APACHE IV predicted ICU LOS were 6.3 ± 6.5 and 6.8 ± 6.5, respectively. The APACHE IV slightly over-predicted ICU LOS with standardized length of stay ratio 0.95 (95% CI 0.89-1.02). The predicted ICU LOS based on the APACHE IV score was statistically longer than the observed ICU LOS (p < 0.001) and were poorly correlated (R2 = 0.02, p < 0.001), especially in patients with a lower severity of illness. In conclusions the APACHE IV model poorly predicted ICU LOS in patients with sepsis. The APACHE IV score needs to be modified or we need to make a new specific model to predict ICU stays in patients with sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of observed and APACHE IV predicted ICU length of stay. APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, ICU intensive care unit, LOS length of stay.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between observed ICU length of stay and APACHE IV predicted length of stay. APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, ICU intensive care unit, LOS length of stay.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Standardized ICU length of stay ratio with 95%CI stratified by the APACHE IV score. APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, CI confidence interval, ICU intensive care unit.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Associated between ICU length of stay and distribution of APACHE IV score. APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, ICU intensive care unit, LOS length of stay.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Calibration curve comparing mean observed and mean APACHE IV predicted ICU length of stay for 10 equal-sized groups. APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, ICU intensive care unit, LOS length of stay.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison predictive ability of APACHE IV, SAPS II and SOFA score for predicting ICU LOS > 1 day. APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, AUC area under the receiving operating characteristic curve, ICU intensive care unit, LOS length of stay, SAPS simplified acute physiology score, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Markwart R, et al. Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1536–1551. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06106-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: The intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir. Med. 2014;2:380–386. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70061-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chattopadhyay A, Chatterjee S. Predicting ICU length of stay using APACHE-IV in persons with severe sepsis: A pilot study. J. Epidemiol. Res. 2015;2:1–8. doi: 10.5430/jer.v2n1p1. - DOI
    1. Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. The direct costs of intensive care management and risk factors for financial burden of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. J. Crit. Care. 2015;30:929–934. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abe T, et al. Characteristics, management, and in-hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis in intensive care units in Japan: The FORECAST study. Crit. Care. 2018;22:322. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2186-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed