The psychometric properties of positive and negative beliefs about the rumination scale in Chinese undergraduates
- PMID: 37041578
- PMCID: PMC10091571
- DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01111-8
The psychometric properties of positive and negative beliefs about the rumination scale in Chinese undergraduates
Abstract
Background: Rumination, a transdiagnostic factor in different psychopathological conditions, is believed to be activated and sustained by dysfunctional metacognition. The Positive Beliefs about Rumination Scale (PBRS) and the Negative Beliefs about Rumination Scale (NBRS) have been used to measure the metacognitive beliefs of rumination and have been investigated in many cultural contexts. However, it remains unclear whether these scales can work as well for the Chinese population. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the Chinese versions of these scales and to test the metacognitive model of rumination for students with different levels of depression.
Methods: The PBRS and NBRS were forward-backward translated into Mandarin. In total 1,025 college students were recruited to complete a battery of web-based questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation analysis were used to test the structure, validity, and reliability of the two scales, as well as their item correlations with rumination.
Results: A new two-factor structure of the PBRS (rather than the original one-factor model) and a new three-factor structure of the NBRS (rather than the original two-factor model) were extracted. The goodness-of-fit indices of these two factor models showed they had a good to very good fit with the data. The internal consistency and construct validity of PBRS and NBRS were also affirmed.
Conclusion: The Chinese versions of the PBRS and the NBRS were generally shown to be reliable and valid, but their newly extracted structures fit the Chinese college students better than their original structures. These new models of PBRS and NBRS are of value to be further explored in Chinese population.
Keywords: Depressive rumination; Metacognition; NBRS; PBRS; Psychometric property.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has competing interests to declare.
Similar articles
-
[Psychometric Properties of the Metacognition Scales about Rumination in Clinical and Non-clinical Turkish Samples].Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2015 Winter;26(4):268-78. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2015. PMID: 26731024 Turkish.
-
Unique contributions of metacognition and cognition to depressive symptoms.J Gen Psychol. 2015;142(1):23-33. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2014.964658. J Gen Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25539184
-
The metacognitive model of rumination and depression in postpartum women.Psychol Psychother. 2022 Sep;95(3):838-852. doi: 10.1111/papt.12405. Epub 2022 May 31. Psychol Psychother. 2022. PMID: 35638223
-
[Psychometric approach of metacognition: Pilot study in clinical population].Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jun 24. Encephale. 2017. PMID: 27349578 French.
-
Psychometric properties of the 10-item ruminative response scale in Chinese university students.BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1318-y. BMC Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28454569 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Psychological stress and depression symptoms in nursing undergraduates: the chain mediating effect of cognitive reappraisal and ruminate thinking.BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 6;24(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02604-6. BMC Nurs. 2025. PMID: 39762876 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Papageorgiou C, Wells A. Positive beliefs about depressive rumination: development and preliminary validation of a self-report scale. Behav Ther. 2001;32(1):13–26. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(01)80041-1. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources