Predicting long-term risk of reoperations following abdominal and pelvic surgery: a nationwide retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 37042312
- PMCID: PMC10389206
- DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000375
Predicting long-term risk of reoperations following abdominal and pelvic surgery: a nationwide retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: The risk of reoperations after abdominal and pelvic surgery is multifactorial and difficult to predict. The risk of reoperation is frequently underestimated by surgeons as most reoperations are not related to the initial procedure and diagnosis. During reoperation, adhesiolysis is often required, and patients have an increased risk of complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based prediction model based on the risk of reoperation.
Materials and methods: A nationwide cohort study was conducted including all patients undergoing an initial abdominal or pelvic operation between 1 June 2009 and 30 June 2011 in Scotland. Nomograms based on multivariable prediction models were constructed for the 2-year and 5-year overall risk of reoperation and risk of reoperation in the same surgical area. Internal cross-validation was applied to evaluate reliability.
Results: Of the 72 270 patients with an initial abdominal or pelvic surgery, 10 467 (14.5%) underwent reoperation within 5 years postoperatively. Mesh placement, colorectal surgery, diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease, previous radiotherapy, younger age, open surgical approach, malignancy, and female sex increased the risk of reoperation in all the prediction models. Intra-abdominal infection was also a risk factor for the risk of reoperation overall. The accuracy of the prediction model of risk of reoperation overall and risk for the same area was good for both parameters ( c -statistic=0.72 and 0.72).
Conclusions: Risk factors for abdominal reoperation were identified and prediction models displayed as nomograms were constructed to predict the risk of reoperation in the individual patient. The prediction models were robust in internal cross-validation.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report.
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Figures



References
-
- Ten Broek RP, Strik C, Issa Y, et al. . Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 2013;258:98–106. - PubMed
-
- Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. . Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:44–52. - PubMed
-
- Ten Broek RP, Bakkum EA, Laarhoven CJ, et al. . Epidemiology and prevention of postsurgical adhesions revisited. Ann Surg 2016;263:12–19. - PubMed
-
- Strik C, Stommel MW, Ten Broek RP, et al. . Adhesiolysis in patients undergoing a repeat median laparotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2015;58:792–798. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical