Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;55(4):238-244.
doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.761754. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

Challenges Meeting Training Requirements in the Care of Children in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study

Affiliations

Challenges Meeting Training Requirements in the Care of Children in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study

Scott Krugman et al. Fam Med. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background and objective: In 2014, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented numeric requirements for family medicine (FM) pediatric patient encounters. Impact on residency programs is unclear. We aimed to identify any difficulties faced by FM program directors (PDs) meeting these numeric requirements.

Methods: Questions about pediatric training in family medicine residencies were included in a survey of PDs conducted by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA). We performed univariate analysis of the demographic and program characteristics. We then used χ2 tests of independence to test for bivariate associations between these characteristics and our primary outcome: the most difficult ACGME pediatric care requirement to meet.

Results: Most programs reported the hospital as the primary location of training (n=131, 46%) and their family medicine practice (FMP) patient population consisted of over 20% pediatric patients (n=153, 56%). Over 80% of program directors reported challenges meeting FM requirements for the care of children. Challenges meeting pediatric requirements were associated with fewer than 20% FMP patients under 19 years of age (P<.0001), fewer than 50% of core FM faculty caring for sick children (P=.0128), and primary location of pediatric training in a family health center (P=.0006).

Conclusion: Difficulty meeting ACGME requirements for the care of children in FM residency programs is common, especially for programs with fewer than 20% FMP patients under 19 years of age. Further research is needed to determine how best to assure FM resident competencies in the care of children and adolescents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hardest ACGME Requirement for Programs to Meet (N=283)

References

    1. Makaroff L A, Xierali I M, Petterson S M, Shipman S A, Puffer J C, Bazemore A W. Factors influencing family physicians’ contribution to the child health care workforce. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(5):427–431. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jetty A, Romano M J, Jabbarpour Y, Petterson S, Bazemore A. A cross-sectional study of factors associated with pediatric scope of care in family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(1):196–207. - PubMed
    1. Phillips R L, Bazemore A W, Dodoo M S, Shipman S A, Green L A. Family physicians in the child health care workforce: opportunities for collaboration in improving the health of children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):1200–1206. - PubMed
    1. Peterson L E, Blackburn B, Phillips R L, Mainous A G, Iii Family medicine department chairs’ opinions regarding scope of practice. Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1691–1697. - PubMed
    1. Bazemore A W, Makaroff L A, Puffer J C. Declining numbers of family physicians are caring for children. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(2):139–140. - PubMed