Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 1;158(6):634-641.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0530.

Residual Risk of Breast Cancer After Bariatric Surgery

Affiliations

Residual Risk of Breast Cancer After Bariatric Surgery

Aristithes G Doumouras et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Excess adiposity confers higher risk of breast cancer for women. For women who have lost substantial weight, it is unclear whether previous obesity confers residual increased baseline risk of breast cancer compared with peers without obesity.

Objectives: To determine whether there is a residual risk of breast cancer due to prior obesity among patients who undergo bariatric surgery.

Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective matched cohort study of 69 260 women with index date between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. Patients were followed up for 5 years after bariatric surgery or index date. Population-based clinical and administrative data from multiple databases in Ontario, Canada, were used to match a cohort of women who underwent bariatric surgery for obesity (baseline body mass index [BMI] ≥35 with comorbid conditions or BMI ≥40) to women without a history of bariatric surgery according to age and breast cancer screening history. Nonsurgical controls were divided into 4 BMI categories (<25, 25-29, 30-34, and ≥35). Data were analyzed on October 21, 2021.

Exposures: Weight loss via bariatric surgery.

Main outcomes and measures: Residual hazard of breast cancer after washout periods of 1, 2, and 5 years. Comparisons were made between the surgical and nonsurgical cohorts overall and within each of the BMI subgroups.

Results: In total, 69 260 women were included in the analysis, with 13 852 women in each of the 5 study cohorts. The mean (SD) age was 45.1 (10.9) years. In the postsurgical cohort vs the overall nonsurgical cohort (n = 55 408), there was an increased hazard for incident breast cancer in the nonsurgical group after washout periods of 1 year (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% CI, 1.18-1.67]), 2 years (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.12-1.53]), and 5 years (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.21-1.58]). When the postsurgical cohort was compared with the nonsurgical cohort with BMI less than 25, the hazard of incident breast cancer was not significantly different regardless of the washout period, whereas there was a reduced hazard for incident breast cancer among postsurgical patients compared with nonsurgical patients in all high BMI categories (BMI ≥25).

Conclusions and relevance: Findings suggest that bariatric surgery was associated with a reduced risk of developing breast cancer for women with prior obesity equivalent to that of a woman with a BMI less than 25 and a lower risk when compared with all groups with BMI greater than or equal to 25.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Unadjusted Cumulative Incidence Curve of Incident Breast Cancer Risk After a 1-Year Washout Period
In total, 659 breast cancers were diagnosed in the study population of 69 260 women (0.95%) during the study period: 103 in the surgical cohort (0.74%), 128 in the group with body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) less than 25 (0.92%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% CI, 0.97-1.62), 143 in the group with BMI 25 to 29 (1.03%; HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.08-1.80), 150 in the group with BMI 30 to 34 (1.08%; HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.14-1.88), and 135 in the group with BMI greater than or equal to 35 (0.97%; HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1 [Reference]). Gray K-sample test P = .04. Median (95% CI) values were not estimable.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Picon-Ruiz M, Morata-Tarifa C, Valle-Goffin JJ, Friedman ER, Slingerland JM. Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(5):378-397. doi:10.3322/caac.21405 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee KR, Hwang IC, Han KD, Jung J, Seo MH. Waist circumference and risk of breast cancer in Korean women: a nationwide cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(8):1554-1559. doi:10.1002/ijc.31180 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K; International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working Group . Body fatness and cancer—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):794-798. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr1606602 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chlebowski RT, Luo J, Anderson GL, et al. . Weight loss and breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women. Cancer. 2019;125(2):205-212. doi:10.1002/cncr.31687 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schapira DV, Clark RA, Wolff PA, Jarrett AR, Kumar NB, Aziz NM. Visceral obesity and breast cancer risk. Cancer. 1994;74(2):632-639. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19940715)74:2<632::AID-CNCR2820740215>3.0.CO;2-T - DOI - PubMed

Publication types