Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 12;13(4):e063125.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063125.

Mental health issues and illness and substance use disorder (non-)disclosure to a supervisor: a cross-sectional study on beliefs, attitudes and needs of military personnel

Rebecca Bogaers  1   2 , Elbert Geuze  2   3 , Jaap van Weeghel  4 , Fenna Leijten  5 , D van de Mheen  4 , N Greenberg  6 , A D Rozema  4 , Evelien Brouwers  4
Affiliations

Mental health issues and illness and substance use disorder (non-)disclosure to a supervisor: a cross-sectional study on beliefs, attitudes and needs of military personnel

Rebecca Bogaers et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Research suggests that military personnel frequently delay disclosing mental health issues and illness (MHI), including substance use disorder, to supervisors. This delay causes missed opportunities for support and workplace accommodations which may help to avoid adverse occupational outcomes. The current study aims to examine disclosure-related beliefs, attitudes and needs, to create a better understanding of personnel's disclosure decision making.

Design: A cross-sectional questionnaire study among military personnel with and without MHI. Beliefs, attitudes and needs regarding the (non-)disclosure decision to a supervisor were examined, including factors associated with (non-)disclosure intentions and decisions. Descriptive and regression (logistic and ordinal) analyses were performed.

Setting: The study took place within the Dutch military.

Participants: Military personnel with MHI (n=324) and without MHI (n=554) were participated in this study.

Outcome measure: (Non-)disclosure intentions and decisions.

Results: Common beliefs and attitudes pro non-disclosure were the preference to solve one's own problems (68.3%), the preference for privacy (58.9%) and a variety of stigma-related concerns. Common beliefs and attitudes pro disclosure were that personnel wanted to be their true authentic selves (93.3%) and the desire to act responsibly towards work colleagues (84.5%). The most reported need for future disclosure (96.8%) was having a supervisor who shows an understanding for MHI. The following factors were associated both with non-disclosure intentions and decisions: higher preference for privacy (OR (95% CI))=(1.99 (1.50 to 2.65)intention, 2.05 (1.12 to 3.76)decision) and self-management (OR (95% CI))=(1.64 (1.20 to 2.23)intention, 1.79 (1.00 to 3.20)decision), higher stigma-related concerns (OR (95% CI))=(1.76 (1.12 to 2.77)intention, 2.21 (1.02 to 4.79)decision) and lower quality of supervisor-employee relationship (OR (95% CI))=(0.25 (0.15 to 0.42)intention, 0.47 (0.25 to 0.87)decision).

Conclusion: To facilitate (early-)disclosure to a supervisor, creating opportunities for workplace support, interventions should focus on decreasing stigma and discrimination and align with personnels' preference for self-management. Furthermore, training is needed for supervisors on how to recognise, and effectively communicate with, personnel with MHI. Focus should also be on improving supervisor-employee relationships.

Keywords: MENTAL HEALTH; OCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PSYCHIATRY; Substance misuse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RB reports grants from The Dutch Ministry of Defence, during the conduct of the study. However, this did not influence the interpretation of the data or the decision to submit the paper for publication. EG has nothing to disclose. NG is the Royal College of Psychiatrists Lead for Trauma and the Military; however, all views expressed are his own. FL is an employee at the Ministry of Defence but this did not influence the interpretation of the data or the decision to submit the paper for publication. JvW has nothing to disclose. DvdM has nothing to disclose. ADR has nothing to disclose. EB reports grants from The Dutch Ministry of Defence, during the conduct of the study. However, this did not influence the interpretation of the data or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Needs regarding future disclosure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brouwers EPM. Social stigma is an underestimated contributing factor to unemployment in people with mental illness or mental health issues: position paper and future directions. BMC Psychol 2020;8:36. 10.1186/s40359-020-00399-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones AM. Disclosure of mental illness in the workplace: a literature review. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil 2011;14:212–29. 10.1080/15487768.2011.598101 - DOI
    1. Brohan E, Henderson C, Wheat K, et al. . Systematic review of beliefs, behaviours and influencing factors associated with disclosure of a mental health problem in the workplace. BMC Psychiatry 2012;12:11. 10.1186/1471-244X-12-11 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Beukering IE, Smits SJC, Janssens KME, et al. . In what ways does health related stigma affect sustainable employment and well-being at work? A systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2022;32:365–79. 10.1007/s10926-021-09998-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brouwers EPM, Joosen MCW, van Zelst C, et al. . To disclose or not to disclose: a multi-stakeholder focus group study on mental health issues in the work environment. J Occup Rehabil 2020;30:84–92. 10.1007/s10926-019-09848-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types