Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 12;8(1):160.
doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01419-2.

Patient-derived xenograft models in cancer therapy: technologies and applications

Affiliations
Review

Patient-derived xenograft models in cancer therapy: technologies and applications

Yihan Liu et al. Signal Transduct Target Ther. .

Abstract

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, in which tumor tissues from patients are implanted into immunocompromised or humanized mice, have shown superiority in recapitulating the characteristics of cancer, such as the spatial structure of cancer and the intratumor heterogeneity of cancer. Moreover, PDX models retain the genomic features of patients across different stages, subtypes, and diversified treatment backgrounds. Optimized PDX engraftment procedures and modern technologies such as multi-omics and deep learning have enabled a more comprehensive depiction of the PDX molecular landscape and boosted the utilization of PDX models. These irreplaceable advantages make PDX models an ideal choice in cancer treatment studies, such as preclinical trials of novel drugs, validating novel drug combinations, screening drug-sensitive patients, and exploring drug resistance mechanisms. In this review, we gave an overview of the history of PDX models and the process of PDX model establishment. Subsequently, the review presents the strengths and weaknesses of PDX models and highlights the integration of novel technologies in PDX model research. Finally, we delineated the broad application of PDX models in chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and other novel therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PDX in the new era of cancer treatment. This figure shows the current conundrums of cancer treatment including restricted beneficiaries, tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance as well as tumor metastasis and recurrence, and shows the versatile functions of PDX in developing therapeutics against cancer
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The brief timeline of milestones in PDX study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The establishment of PDX. a Showing the establishment process of PDX. b Showing the factors affecting the engraftment rate and the categories of PDX mice
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The advantages of PDX over other models. a PDX could preserve the genetic landscape, morphology and phenotype of the parental tumor. b PDX could maintain tumor heterogeneity and specific traits of metastases. c The realization of cancer-immune interaction in humanized PDX: human immune system tends to be educated by tumor and exhibits an exhausted status over time, and tumors maintain evolution and heterogeneity to survive with upregulated immunosuppressive molecules and decreased production of human pro-inflammatory cytokines. d PDX could reproduce the drug response observed in patients
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The weaknesses existing in current PDX models. a Tumor stroma tends to be replaced by murine-derived ECM and stromal cells after several passages, which hinders immune cell activation without human cytokine secretion. b Loss of subclones heterogeneity during the establishment and passage of PDX. c PDX mice have a relatively high risk of spontaneous lymphoma which could cover up accurate results due to the distinct drug sensitivities between lymphoma and other tumors

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Letai A, Bhola P, Welm AL. Functional precision oncology: testing tumors with drugs to identify vulnerabilities and novel combinations. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.12.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woolston A, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic determinants of therapy resistance and immune landscape evolution during anti-EGFR treatment in colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:35–50 e39. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.05.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen K, et al. Perioperative dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA in patients with lung cancer (DYNAMIC) Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;25:7058–7067. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1213. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hay M, et al. Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:40–51. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2786. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marusyk A, Janiszewska M, Polyak K. Intratumor heterogeneity: the rosetta stone of therapy resistance. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:471–484. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types