Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 29;15(7):2027.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15072027.

PSMA-PET Guided Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients with Oligorecurrent Progression after Previous Salvage Treatment

Affiliations

PSMA-PET Guided Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients with Oligorecurrent Progression after Previous Salvage Treatment

Lorenzo Bianchi et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is used to select recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients for metastases-directed therapy (MDT). We aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of second-line PSMA-guided MDT in oligo-recurrent PCa patients.

Methods: we performed a retrospective analysis of 113 recurrent PCa after previous radical prostatectomy and salvage therapies with oligorecurrent disease at PSMA-PET (≤3 lesions in N1/M1a-b) in three high-volume European centres. Patients underwent second-line salvage treatments: MDT targeted to PSMA (including surgery and/or radiotherapy), and the conventional approach (observation or Androgen Deprivation Therapy [ADT]). Patients were stratified according to treatments (MDT vs. conventional approach). Patients who underwent MDT were stratified according to stage in PSMA-PET (N1 vs. M1a-b). The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant PCa free survival (CRPC-FS). Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS. Multivariable Cox regression models identified predictors of progression and metastatic disease.

Results: Overall, 91 (80%) and 22 (20%) patients were treated with MDT and the conventional approach, respectively. The median follow-up after PSMA-PET was 31 months. Patients who underwent MDT had a similar PFS compared to the conventional approach (p = 0.3). Individuals referred to MDT had significantly higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to those who were treated with the conventional approach (73.5% and 94.7% vs. 30.5% and 79.5%; all p ≤ 0.001). In patients undergoing MDT, no significant differences were found for PFS and MFS according to N1 vs. M1a-b disease, while CRPC-FS estimates were significantly higher in patients with N1 vs. M1a-b (100% vs. 86.1%; p = 0.02). At multivariable analyses, age (HR = 0.96) and ADT during second line salvage treatment (HR = 0.5) were independent predictors of PFS; MDT (HR 0.27) was the only independent predictor of MFS (all p ≤ 0.04) Conclusion: Patients who underwent second-line PSMA-guided MDT experienced higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to men who received conventional management.

Keywords: PSMA-PET; hormone sensitive prostate cancer; metastasis-directed therapy; oligorecurrent prostate cancer; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of participants in the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Localization of oligorecurrent disease detected by PSMA-PET according to miTNM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) rates in the overall population (n = 113) according to type of treatment performed (MDT approach vs. conventional approach); (b) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Metastases Free Survival (MPFS) rates in the overall population (n = 113) according to type of treatment performed (MDT approach vs. conventional approach); (c) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Free Survival (CRPC-FS) rates in the overall population (n = 113) according to type of treatment performed (MDT approach vs. conventional approach).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) rates in the overall population (n = 113) according to type of treatment performed (MDT approach vs. conventional approach); (b) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Metastases Free Survival (MPFS) rates in the overall population (n = 113) according to type of treatment performed (MDT approach vs. conventional approach); (c) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Free Survival (CRPC-FS) rates in the overall population (n = 113) according to type of treatment performed (MDT approach vs. conventional approach).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) rates in patients treated with the MDT approach (n = 91) according to miTNM stage at PSMA-PET (miN1 vs. miM1a-M1b); (b) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Metastases Free Survival (PFS) rates in patients treated with the MDT approach (n = 91) according to miTNM stage at PSMA-PET (miN1 vs. miM1a-M1b); (c) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Free Survival (CRPC-FS) rates in patients treated with the MDT approach (n = 91) according to miTNM stage at PSMA-PET (miN1 vs. miM1a-M1b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) rates in patients treated with the MDT approach (n = 91) according to miTNM stage at PSMA-PET (miN1 vs. miM1a-M1b); (b) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Metastases Free Survival (PFS) rates in patients treated with the MDT approach (n = 91) according to miTNM stage at PSMA-PET (miN1 vs. miM1a-M1b); (c) Kaplan-Meier curve depicting Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Free Survival (CRPC-FS) rates in patients treated with the MDT approach (n = 91) according to miTNM stage at PSMA-PET (miN1 vs. miM1a-M1b).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ost P., Reynders D., Decaestecker K., Fonteyne V., Lumen N., De Bruycker A., Lambert A., Delrue L., Bultijnck R., Claeys T., et al. Surveillance or Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Recurrence: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36:446–453. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4853. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Calais J., Ceci F., Eiber M., AHope T., SHofman M., Rischpler C., Bach-Gansmo T., Nanni C., Savir-Baruch B., Elashoff D., et al. (18)F-fluciclovine PET-CT and (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: A prospective, single-centre, single-arm, comparative imaging trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1286–1294. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30415-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perera M., Papa N., Christidis D., Wetherell D., Hofman M.S., Murphy D.G., Bolton D., Lawrentschuk N. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 2016;70:926–937. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farolfi A., Ceci F., Castellucci P., Graziani T., Siepe G., Lambertini A., Schiavina R., Lodi F., Morganti A.G., Fanti S., et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and PSA <0.5 ng/ml. Efficacy and impact on treatment strategy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2019;46:11–19. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4066-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gundem G., Van Loo P., Kremeyer B., Alexandrov L.B., Tubio J.M.C., Papaemmanuil E., Brewer D.S., Kallio H.M.L., Högnäs G., Annala M., et al. The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature. 2015;520:353–357. doi: 10.1038/nature14347. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources