Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 5;24(7):6778.
doi: 10.3390/ijms24076778.

Checkpoint Kinase 1 Is a Key Signal Transducer of DNA Damage in the Early Mammalian Cleavage Embryo

Affiliations
Review

Checkpoint Kinase 1 Is a Key Signal Transducer of DNA Damage in the Early Mammalian Cleavage Embryo

Vladimír Baran et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

After fertilization, remodeling of the oocyte and sperm genome is essential for the successful initiation of mitotic activity in the fertilized oocyte and subsequent proliferative activity of the early embryo. Despite the fact that the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle control in early mammalian embryos are in principle comparable to those in somatic cells, there are differences resulting from the specific nature of the gene totipotency of the blastomeres of early cleavage embryos. In this review, we focus on the Chk1 kinase as a key transduction factor in monitoring the integrity of DNA molecules during early embryogenesis.

Keywords: Chk1 kinase; DNA damage; cell cycle checkpoint; cleaving embryo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cell cycle checkpoints in the temporal context of cleavage of the early mouse embryo. Time values are averages due to variability between individual lines of laboratory mice. SAC—spindle assembly checkpoint.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simplified scheme of the Chk1 interactions in the DNA damage response.

References

    1. Musson R., Gąsior Ł., Bisogno S., Ptak G.E. DNA damage in preimplantation embryos and gametes: Specification, clinical relevance and repair strategies. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2022;28:376–399. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmab046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munisha M., Schimenti J.C. Genome maintenance during embryogenesis. DNA Repair. 2021;106:103195. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103195. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santos F., Hendrich B., Reik W., Dean W. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 2002;241:172–182. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0501. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pailas A., Niaka K., Zorzompokou C., Marangos P. The DNA Damage Response in Fully Grown Mammalian Oocytes. Cells. 2022;11:798. doi: 10.3390/cells11050798. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ladstatter S., Tachibana-Konwalski K. A Surveillance mechanism ensure repair of DNA lesions during zygotic reprogramming. Cell. 2016;167:1774–1787. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources