Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 6;24(7):6801.
doi: 10.3390/ijms24076801.

Artificial Intelligence That Predicts Sensitizing Potential of Cosmetic Ingredients with Accuracy Comparable to Animal and In Vitro Tests-How Does the Infotechnomics Compare to Other "Omics" in the Cosmetics Safety Assessment?

Affiliations

Artificial Intelligence That Predicts Sensitizing Potential of Cosmetic Ingredients with Accuracy Comparable to Animal and In Vitro Tests-How Does the Infotechnomics Compare to Other "Omics" in the Cosmetics Safety Assessment?

Jadwiga Kalicińska et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to develop an in silico model to predict the sensitizing potential of cosmetic ingredients based on their physicochemical characteristics and to compare the predictions with historical animal data and results from "omics"-based in vitro studies. An in silico model was developed with the use of WEKA machine learning software fed with physicochemical and structural descriptors of haptens and trained with data from published epidemiological studies compiled into estimated odds ratio (eOR) and estimated attributable risk (eAR) indices. The outcome classification was compared to the results of animal studies and in vitro tests. Of all the models tested, the best results were obtained for the Naive Bayes classifier trained with 24 physicochemical descriptors and eAR, which yielded an accuracy of 86%, sensitivity of 80%, and specificity of 90%. This model was subsequently used to predict the sensitizing potential of 15 emerging and less-studied haptens, of which 7 were classified as sensitizers: cyclamen aldehyde, N,N-dimethylacrylamide, dimethylthiocarbamyl benzothiazole sulphide, geraniol hydroperoxide, isobornyl acrylate, neral, and prenyl caffeate. The best-performing model (NaiveBayes eAR, 24 parameters), along with an alternative model based on eOR (Random Comittee eOR, 17 parameters), are available for further tests by interested readers. In conclusion, the proposed infotechnomics approach allows for a prediction of the sensitizing potential of cosmetic ingredients (and possibly also other haptens) with accuracy comparable to historical animal tests and in vitro tests used nowadays. In silico models consume little resources, are free of ethical concerns, and can provide results for multiple chemicals almost instantly; therefore, the proposed approach seems useful in the safety assessment of cosmetics.

Keywords: contact allergy; cosmetic ingredients; in silico modelling; infotechnomics; risk assessment; sensitizing potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hafner M.D.F.S., Rodrigues A.C., Lazzarini R. Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics: Retrospective analysis of a population subjected to patch tests between 2004 and 2017. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2020;95:696–701. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.04.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Horton E., Uter W., Geier J., Ballmer-Weber B., Bauer A., Bircher A., Dickel H., Giménez-Arnau A., Gonçalo M., John S.M., et al. Developing a cosmetic series: Results from the ESSCA network, 2009–2018. Contact Dermat. 2021;84:82–94. doi: 10.1111/cod.13690. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbaud A., Lafforgue C. Risks associated with cosmetic ingredients. Ann. Dermatol. Venereol. 2021;148:77–93. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2020.04.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. [(accessed on 27 March 2023)];Off. J. Eur. Union. 2009 L 342:59. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-11/cosmetic_1223_2009_regu....
    1. Reeder M.J., Warshaw E., Aravamuthan S., Belsito D.V., Geier J., Wilkinson M., Atwater A.R., White I.R., Silverberg J.I., Taylor J.S., et al. Trends in the Prevalence of Methylchloroisothiazolinone/Methylisothiazolinone Contact Allergy in North America and Europe. JAMA Dermatol. 2023;159:267–274. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.5991. - DOI - PMC - PubMed