Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 4;20(7):5384.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075384.

Evaluating Drivers of the Patient Experience Triangle: Stress, Anxiety, and Frustration

Affiliations

Evaluating Drivers of the Patient Experience Triangle: Stress, Anxiety, and Frustration

Sumaya Almaazmi et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Patient experience is a widely used indicator for assessing the quality-of-care process during a patient's journey in hospital. However, the literature rarely discusses three components: patient stress, anxiety, and frustration. Furthermore, little is known about what drives each component during hospital visits. In order to explore this, we utilized data from a patient experience survey, including patient- and provider-related determinants, that was administered at a local hospital in Abu Dhabi, UAE. A machine-learning-based random forest (RF) algorithm, along with its embedded importance analysis function feature, was used to explore and rank the drivers of patient stress, anxiety, and frustration throughout two stages of the patient journey: registration and consultation. The attribute 'age' was identified as the primary patient-related determinant driving patient stress, anxiety, and frustration throughout the registration and consultation stages. In the registration stage, 'total time taken for registration' was the key driver of patient stress, whereas 'courtesy demonstrated by the registration staff in meeting your needs' was the key driver of anxiety and frustration. In the consultation step, 'waiting time to see the doctor/physician' was the key driver of both patient stress and frustration, whereas 'the doctor/physician was able to explain your symptoms using language that was easy to understand' was the main driver of anxiety. The RF algorithm provided valuable insights, showing the relative importance of factors affecting patient stress, anxiety, and frustration throughout the registration and consultation stages. Healthcare managers can utilize and allocate resources to improve the overall patient experience during hospital visits based on the importance of patient- and provider-related determinants.

Keywords: machine learning; patient anxiety; patient data; patient experience; patient frustration; patient satisfaction; patient stress; quality; random forest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative importance summary of the RF model for overall stress, anxiety, and frustration throughout the registration step.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative importance summary of the RF model for overall stress, anxiety, and frustration throughout the consultation step.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Batbaatar E., Dorjdagva J., Luvsannyam A., Savino M.M., Amenta P. Determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review. Perspect. Public Health. 2017;137:89–101. doi: 10.1177/1757913916634136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Risser N.L. Development of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with nurses and nursing care in primary care settings. Nurs. Res. 1975;24:45–52. doi: 10.1097/00006199-197501000-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. The Quality of Medical Care. Science. 1978;200:856–864. doi: 10.1126/science.417400. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simsekler M.C.E., Qazi A., Alalami M.A., Ellahham S., Ozonoff A. Evaluation of patient safety culture using a random forest algorithm. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2020;204:107186. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107186. - DOI
    1. Dawn A.G., Lee P.P. Patient satisfaction instruments used at academic medical centers: Results of a survey. Am. J. Med. Qual. Off. J. Am. Coll. Med. Qual. 2003;18:265–269. doi: 10.1177/106286060301800607. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types