Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 30;12(7):2614.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12072614.

Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes after Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Cervical Cancer: Current Approach and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes after Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Cervical Cancer: Current Approach and Future Directions

Milan Terzic et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in women of reproductive age. The established fertility-sparing approaches for the management of early-stage cervical cancer for women who plan pregnancy are associated with a decline in fecundity and an increased risk of pregnancy complications. This article aims to offer an overview of fertility-sparing approaches and the management of potential subfertility and pregnancy complications after these treatments. An extensive search for the available data about infertility and cervical cancer, fertility-sparing techniques in patients with cervical cancer, fertility treatment, obstetrical complications, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cancer patients was completed. Fertility-preserving procedures such as loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), cold-knife conization, and trachelectomy in women diagnosed with cervical cancer can be considered as safe and effective treatments that preserve reproductive potential. Current fertility-preserving procedures, based on the balance of the oncological characteristics of patients as well as their desire for reproduction, allow one to obtain acceptable reproductive and obstetric outcomes in women treated for cervical cancer. Nevertheless, careful monitoring of pregnancies obtained after fertility-preserving procedures is recommended, since this cohort of patients should be considered at higher risk compared with a healthy population.

Keywords: cervical cancer; fertility-sparing surgery; infertility; obstetrical complication; pregnancy outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fertility sparing surgical approach in early stages of cervical cancer. Figure legend: FIGO-Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d’Obstétrique; LEEP-loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Non-surgical fertility-preserving approaches.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mascarenhas M.N., Flaxman S.R., Boerma T., Vanderpoel S., Stevens G.A. National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greil A.L. Infertility and psychological distress: A critical review of the literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 1997;45:1679–1704. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00102-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bueno-Sánchez L., Alhambra-Borrás T., Gallego-Valadés A., Garcés-Ferrer J. Quality of Life and Conformity to Gender Norms in Women Receiving Assisted Reproductive Technologies as a Potential Indicator of Mental Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:10031. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610031. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourrion B., Panjo H., Bithorel P.L., de La Rochebrochard E., François M., Pelletier-Fleury N. The economic burden of infertility treatment and distribution of expenditures overtime in France: A self-controlled pre-post study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2022;22:512. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07725-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson K.M., Sharpe M., Rattray A. Distress and concerns in couples referred to a specialist infertility clinic. J. Psychosom. Res. 2003;54:353–355. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00398-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources