Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 31;12(7):2633.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12072633.

Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients-A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal

Affiliations

Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients-A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal

Christian Tapking et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017-October 2022) were included in this study and grouped in the younger (18-65 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) groups. Primary outcome was a necessity of surgery subsequent to ED. Both groups (patient characteristics, surgical and non-surgical treatment) were compared. Multiple logistic and linear regression models were used to identify the effect of age on the outcomes. A total of 169 patients were included (younger group: 135 patients, geriatric group: 34 patients). The burn size as indicated by %TBSA (24.2 ± 20.4% vs. 26.8 ± 17.1%, p = 0.499) was similar in both groups. The ASA (2.5 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and ABSI scores (6.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the geriatric group. The %TBSA treated with ED (5.4 ± 5.0% vs. 4.4 ± 4.3%, p = 0.245) were similar in both groups. The necessity of additional surgical interventions (63.0 % vs. 58.8 %, p = 0.763) and the wound size debrided and grafted (2.9 ± 3.5% vs. 2.2 ± 2.1%; p = 0.301) were similar in both groups. Regression models yielded that age did not have an effect on efficacy of ED. We showed that ED is reliable and safe to use in geriatric patients. Age did not have a significant influence on the surgical outcomes of ED. In both groups, the size of the grafted area was reduced and, in many patients, surgery was avoided completely.

Keywords: NexoBrid©; burns; elderly; enzymatic debridement; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

U.K. declares, that he organized the 2020 European Consensus Meeting for Mediwound Germany Gmbh and received royalties. C.T. and L.C.S. attended the European Burn Association Meeting 2022, sponsored by Mediwound Germany GmbH.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Aging and Heath Fact Sheet. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2022.
    1. Gioffrè-Florio M., Murabito L.M., Visalli C., Pergolizzi F.P., Famà F. Trauma in elderly patients: A study of prevalence, comorbidities and gender differences. Il G. Di Chir. 2018;39:35–40. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.1.035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jeschke M.G., Patsouris D., Stanojcic M., Abdullahi A., Rehou S., Pinto R., Chen P., Burnett M., Amini-Nik S. Pathophysiologic Response to Burns in the Elderly. eBioMedicine. 2015;2:1536–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.07.040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abu-Sittah G., Chahine F.M., Janom H. Management of burns in the elderly. Ann. Burn. Fire Disasters. 2016;29:249–255. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wearn C., Hardwicke J., Kitsios A., Siddons V., Nightingale P., Moiemen N. Outcomes of burns in the elderly: Revised estimates from the Birmingham Burn Centre. Burns. 2015;41:1161–1168. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.04.008. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources