Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 4;12(7):2708.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12072708.

Current Trends in Volume and Surgical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Current Trends in Volume and Surgical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer

Luigi Marano et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Gastric cancer is ranked as the fifth most frequently diagnosed type of cancer. Complete resection with adequate lymphadenectomy represents the goal of treatment with curative intent. Quality assurance is a crucial factor in the evaluation of oncological surgical care, and centralization of healthcare in referral hospitals has been proposed in several countries. However, an international agreement about the setting of "high-volume hospitals" as well as "minimum volume standards" has not yet been clearly established. Despite the clear postoperative mortality benefits that have been described for gastric cancer surgery conducted by high-volume surgeons in high-volume hospitals, many authors have highlighted the limitations of a non-composite variable to define the ideal postoperative period. The textbook outcome represents a multidimensional measure assessing the quality of care for cancer patients. Transparent and easily available hospital data will increase patients' awareness, providing suitable elements for a more informed hospital choice.

Keywords: centralization; gastrectomy; gastric cancer; healthcare; hospital volume; quality of care; surgical volume; textbook outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fock K.M. Review Article: The Epidemiology and Prevention of Gastric Cancer. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014;40:250–260. doi: 10.1111/apt.12814. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2018 (5th Edition) Gastric Cancer. 2021;24:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Manzoni G., Marrelli D., Baiocchi G.L., Morgagni P., Saragoni L., Degiuli M., Donini A., Fumagalli U., Mazzei M.A., Pacelli F., et al. The Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) Guidelines for Gastric Cancer Staging and Treatment: 2015. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:20–30. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0615-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Degiuli M., De Manzoni G., Di Leo A., D’Ugo D., Galasso E., Marrelli D., Petrioli R., Polom K., Roviello F., Santullo F., et al. Gastric Cancer: Current Status of Lymph Node Dissection. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016;22:2875. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2875. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marano L., Marrelli D., Roviello F. Focus on Research: Nodal Dissection for Gastric Cancer-A Dilemma Worthy of King Solomon! Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;42:1623–1624. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.143. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources