Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 27;15(7):1629.
doi: 10.3390/nu15071629.

Prevalence of Front-of-Pack Warning Signs among Commercial Complementary Foods in Seven High and Upper Middle-Income Countries

Eleonora Bassetti  1 , Asha Khosravi  1 , Alissa M Pries  1
Affiliations

Prevalence of Front-of-Pack Warning Signs among Commercial Complementary Foods in Seven High and Upper Middle-Income Countries

Eleonora Bassetti et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Front-of-pack nutrition labelling (FOPNL) can provide a mechanism for communicating the nutritional quality of commercially produced complementary foods (CPCF) to caregivers. To better understand the role FOPNL may provide for CPCF, this study aimed to evaluate CPCFs against national and global FOPNL systems to determine the proportion that would warrant warning or traffic light signs for high levels of concerning nutrients. A cross-sectional assessment was conducted to evaluate the levels of selected nutrients in CPCF available in Australia (n = 266), Brazil (n = 41), Chile (n = 73), Mexico (n = 164), the United States (n = 562), the United Arab Emirates (n = 135), and the United Kingdom (n = 643). The analysis was based on national FOPNL systems and the WHO Regional Office for Europe CPCF nutrient profiling model's 'high sugar' FOPNL warning. A substantial proportion of CPCFs contained excessive levels of total sugar, total fat or saturated fat that would warrant a red/amber traffic light or warning sign on product labels. Additionally, the high prevalence of added sugars and sweeteners identified in CPCFs was concerning. Based on these findings, the use of FOPNL among CPCFs could be beneficial to communicate the nutritional quality of these products to caregivers and trigger the reformulation of CPCFs with inappropriate nutrient profiles.

Keywords: complementary foods; food industry; food labelling/methods; food labelling/standards; infant and young child feeding; nutrient profiling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of commercially produced complementary foods warranting a warning sign 1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. UNICEF . Improving Young Children’s Diets During the Complementary Feeding Period-UNICEF Programming Guidance. UNICEF; New York, NY, USA: 2020.
    1. Quinn V., Zehner E., Schofield D., Guyon A., Huffman S. Using the Code to Guide the Marketing of Complementary Foods to Protect Optimal Infant Feeding Practices: GAIN Working Paper Series. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN); Geneva, Switzerland: 2010.
    1. WHO . First Meeting of the WHO Scientific and Technical Advisory Group on Inappropriate Promotion of Foods for Infants and Young Children. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2013.
    1. WHO Regional Office for Europe . In: Ending Inappropriate Promotion of Commercially Available Complementary Foods for Infants and Young Children between 6 and 36 Months in Europe. Copenhagen Ø., editor. WHO Regional Office for Europe; København, Denmark: 2019.
    1. Maalouf J., Cogswell M.E., Bates M., Yuan K., Scanlon K.S., Pehrsson P., Gunn J.P., Merritt R.K. Sodium, Sugar, and fat content of complementary infant and toddler foods sold in the United States, 2015. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017;105:1443–1452. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.142653. - DOI - PubMed