PROTOCOL: Impact of social protection on gender equality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of reviews
- PMID: 37051182
- PMCID: PMC8356277
- DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1161
PROTOCOL: Impact of social protection on gender equality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of reviews
Abstract
This is the protocol for a Campbell review. The review aims to systematically collect, appraise, map and synthesise the evidence from systematic reviews on the differential gender impacts of social protection programmes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Therefore, it will answer the following questions: (1) What is known from systematic reviews on the gender-differentiated impacts of social protection programmes in LMICs? (2) What is known from systematic reviews about the factors that determine these gender-differentiated impacts? (3) What is known from existing systematic reviews about design and implementation features of social protection programmes and their association with gender outcomes?
© 2021 The Authors. Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration.
Figures
References
-
- Aromataris, E. , & Munn, Z. (2020). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI.
-
- Aromataris, E. , Fernandez, R. , Godfrey, C. M. , Holly, C. , Khalil, H. , & Tungpunkom, P. (2015). Summarizing systematic reviews: Methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. International Journal of Evidence‐Based Healthcare, 13, 13–140. - PubMed
-
- Baird, S. , Ferreira, F. H. G. , Özler, B. , & Woolcock, M. (2014). Conditional, unconditional and everything in between: A systematic review of the effects of cash transfer programmes on schooling outcomes. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 6(1), 1–43.
-
- Bakrania, S. (2020). Methodological briefs on evidence synthesis: Brief 2—Introduction. Innocenti Research Brief.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources