Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Apr 5:16:925-935.
doi: 10.2147/CCID.S403330. eCollection 2023.

Incorporation of the 40-Gene Expression Profile (40-GEP) Test to Improve Treatment Decisions in High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC) Patients: Case Series and Algorithm

Affiliations
Case Reports

Incorporation of the 40-Gene Expression Profile (40-GEP) Test to Improve Treatment Decisions in High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC) Patients: Case Series and Algorithm

Gaurav Singh et al. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. .

Abstract

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) has become a significant public health issue due to its rapidly rising incidence and an estimated 1.8 million newly diagnosed cases annually. As with other cancers, treatment decisions for patients with cSCC are based primarily on a patient's risk for poor outcomes. There has been improvement in clinicopathologic factor-based risk assessment approaches, either through informal methods or ever evolving staging approaches. However, these approaches misidentify patients who will eventually have disease progression as low-risk and conversely, over classify patients as high-risk who do not experience relapse. To improve the accuracy of risk assessment for patients with cSCC, the 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test has been validated to show statistically significant stratification of a high-risk cSCC patient's risk of nodal or distant metastasis, independent of currently available risk-assessment methods. The 40-GEP test allows for a more accurate classification of metastatic risk for high-risk cSCC patients, with the aim to influence appropriate allocation of clinician time and therapeutic resources to those patients who will most benefit. The objective of this article is to present a treatment algorithm in which clinicians can easily integrate the results of the 40-GEP test into their current treatment approaches to tailor patient care based on individual tumor biology. The following modalities were considered: surveillance imaging, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), adjuvant radiation therapy (ART), and clinical follow-up. The authors have contributed their own cases for discussion as to how they have seen the beneficial impact of 40-GEP test results in their own practice. Overall, clinicians can identify risk-aligned treatment pathway improvements with the use of the 40-GEP test for challenging to manage, high-risk cSCC patients.

Keywords: 40-GEP; 40-gene expression profile; cSCC; clinician algorithm; cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; metastasis; patient management; prognostic; risk-stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

GS is a consultant for Castle Biosciences Inc., during the conduct of the study and a consultant for Regeneron, outside the submitted work. ASF is an advisor for Castle Biosciences Inc. and Regeneron. SNT declares no relevant conflicts of interest in this work. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A treatment algorithm for incorporation of 40-GEP test results into treatment decisions for a high-risk cSCC patient compared to current NCCN guideline recommendations. *Multidisciplinary board should be considered; **Choice of imaging technique dependent on number and type of high-risk factors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Various stages of treatment for Case 1. (A) Presentation; (B) Mohs surgery; (C) Histological diagnosis; (D) Post-procedure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Various stages of treatment for Case 2. (A) Presentation; (B) Mohs surgery; (C) Histological diagnosis; (D) Post-procedure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Various stages of treatment for Case 3. (A) Presentation; (B) Mohs surgery; (C) Histological diagnosis; (D) Post-procedure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hu W, Fang L, Ni R, et al. Changing trends in the disease burden of non-melanoma skin cancer globally from 1990 to 2019 and its predicted level in 25 years. BMC Cancer. 2022;22:836. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ciążyńska M, Kamińska-Winciorek G, Lange D, et al. The incidence and clinical analysis of non-melanoma skin cancer. Sci Rep. 2021;11:4337. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Feldman SR, et al. Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer (Keratinocyte carcinomas) in the US Population, 2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:1081–1086. - PubMed
    1. Lukowiak TM, Aizman L, Perz A, et al. Association of age, sex, race, and geographic region with variation of the ratio of basal cell to cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in the United States. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:1192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmults CD, Karia PS, Carter JB, et al. Factors predictive of recurrence and death from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a 10-year, single-institution cohort study. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:541–547. - PubMed

Publication types