Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 27:14:1020494.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1020494. eCollection 2023.

Overbenefitting, underbenefitting, and balanced: Different effort-reward profiles and their relationship with employee well-being, mental health, and job attitudes among young employees

Affiliations

Overbenefitting, underbenefitting, and balanced: Different effort-reward profiles and their relationship with employee well-being, mental health, and job attitudes among young employees

Jie Li et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

We aimed to identify different, both balanced and imbalanced, effort-reward profiles and their relations to several indicators of employee well-being (work engagement, job satisfaction, job boredom, and burnout), mental health (positive functioning, life satisfaction, anxiety, and depression symptoms), and job attitudes (organizational identification and turnover intention). We examined data drawn randomly from Finnish population (n = 1,357) of young adults (23-34 years of age) collected in the summer of 2021 with quantitative methods. Latent profile analysis revealed three emerging groups in the data characterized by different combinations of efforts and rewards: underbenefitting (16%, high effort/low reward), overbenefitting (34%, low effort/high reward), and balanced employees (50%, same levels of efforts and rewards). Underbenefitting employees reported poorest employee well-being and mental health, and more negative job attitudes. In general, balanced employees fared slightly better than overbenefitting employees. Balanced employees experienced higher work engagement, life satisfaction, and less depression symptoms. The findings highlight the importance of balancing work efforts with sufficient rewards so that neither outweighs the other. This study suggests that the current effort-reward model would benefit from conceptualizing the previously ignored perspective of overbenefitting state and from considering professional development as one of the essential rewards at work.

Keywords: effort–reward imbalance; employee well-being; job attitudes; latent profile analysis; mental health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The three-profile solution for different combinations of efforts and rewards at work. Mean values are presented on the vertical axis. Percentages represent proportions from the data.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The standardized means (mean = 0, standard deviation = 1) of the outcome variables [panel (A) for employee well-being, panel (B) for mental health, and panel (C) for job attitudes] for each of the three profiles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams J. S. (1965). “Inequity in social exchange” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2. ed. L. Berkowitz (New York: Academic Press; ), 267–299.
    1. Akkermans J., Tims M., Beijer S., De Cuyper N. (2019). Should employers invest in employability? Examining employability as a mediator in the HRM-commitment relationship. Front. Psychol. 10:717. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00717, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashforth B. E. (2016). Distinguished scholar invited essay: exploring identity and identification in organizations: time for some course corrections. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 23, 361–373. doi: 10.1177/1548051816667897 - DOI
    1. Ashforth B. E., Mael F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14:20. doi: 10.2307/258189 - DOI
    1. Asparouhov T., Muthén B. O. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes 21, 1–22.

LinkOut - more resources