Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 21;4(2):110-119.
doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.42.BJO-2022-0152.R1.

Implant survival of total elbow arthroplasty: analysis of 514 cases from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry

Affiliations

Implant survival of total elbow arthroplasty: analysis of 514 cases from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry

Arno A Macken et al. Bone Jt Open. .

Abstract

The aim of this study is to report the implant survival and factors associated with revision of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using data from the Dutch national registry. All TEAs recorded in the Dutch national registry between 2014 and 2020 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and a logistic regression model was used to assess the factors associated with revision. A total of 514 TEAs were included, of which 35 were revised. The five-year implant survival was 91%. Male sex, a higher BMI, and previous surgery to the same elbow showed a statistically significant association with revision (p < 0.036). Of the 35 revised implants, ten (29%) underwent a second revision. This study reports a five-year implant survival of TEA of 91%. Patient factors associated with revision are defined and can be used to optimize informed consent and shared decision-making. There was a high rate of secondary revisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors confirm that have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier plot for revision-free survival of total elbow arthroplasties performed in the Netherlands between 2014 to 2020.

References

    1. Macken AA, Prkic A, Kodde IF, Lans J, Chen NC, Eygendaal D. Global trends in indications for total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of national registries. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(4):215–220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Welsink CL, Lambers KTA, van Deurzen DFP, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MPJ. Total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2017;5(7):e4. - PubMed
    1. Burden EG, Batten T, Smith C, Evans JP. Hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged over 65 years : a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes and complications. Bone Joint J. 2022;104-B(5):559–566. - PubMed
    1. Chou TFA, Ma HH, Wang JH, et al. Total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Jt J. 2020;102:967–980. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang J-H, Ma H-H, Chou T-FA, et al. Outcomes following total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis versus post-traumatic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(12):1489–1497. - PMC - PubMed