Clinical efficacy of soft-tissue augmentation on tissue preservation at immediate implant sites: A randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 37052357
- DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13816
Clinical efficacy of soft-tissue augmentation on tissue preservation at immediate implant sites: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Aim: This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of soft-tissue augmentation (STA) with a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) or an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) on reducing tissue alterations at an immediate implant site.
Materials and methods: This trial had three groups: (i) immediate implant with SCTG (ICT group); (ii) immediate implant with ADM (IAD group); (iii) immediate implant without STA (control group). Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to each group. Implants were placed at the maxillary anterior or premolar areas and restored after the 6-month visit. Clinical outcomes, including buccal soft-tissue contour, peri-implant mucosal level, soft-tissue thickness and keratinized tissue width, were measured at baseline and at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Radiographic bone levels were measured at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Patient-reported outcomes were also collected.
Results: STA procedures increased peri-implant mucosal thickness and maintained buccal soft-tissue contours. Compared to the control group, STA groups did not prevent peri-implant mucosal recession or interproximal bone resorption. Generally, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were detected between the ICT and IAD groups. Most patients were highly satisfied with the immediate implant procedure and outcomes without significant differences between groups.
Conclusions: STA at immediate implant sites enhanced soft-tissue thickness and maintained soft-tissue contours but did not prevent peri-implant mucosal recession or interproximal bone resorption. Long-term follow-up should be performed since these results were reported for only up to 1 year.
Keywords: alloderm; alveolar bone loss; connective tissue; dental implants; patient-reported outcome measures; single-tooth.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abbas, W. M. (2020). Comparative randomized clinical study of acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue graft around immediate dental implants: 12-months clinical and esthetic outcomes. Egyptian Dental Journal, 66 (1-January (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology)), 313-325.
-
- Aldhohrah, T., Qin, G., Liang, D., Song, W., Ge, L., Mashrah, M. A., & Wang, L. (2022). Does simultaneous soft tissue augmentation around immediate or delayed dental implant placement using sub-epithelial connective tissue graft provide better outcomes compared to other treatment options? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 17(2), e0261513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261513
-
- Becker, B. E., Becker, W., Ricci, A., & Geurs, N. (1998). A prospective clinical trial of endosseous screw-shaped implants placed at the time of tooth extraction without augmentation. Journal of Periodontology, 69(8), 920-926. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.8.920
-
- Belser, U. C., Grutter, L., Vailati, F., Bornstein, M. M., Weber, H. P., & Buser, D. (2009). Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: A cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. Journal of Periodontology, 80(1), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435
-
- Berglundh, T., & Lindhe, J. (1996). Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 23(10), 971-973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00520.x
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources