Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;56(7):1406-1416.
doi: 10.1002/eat.23951. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

Development of transdiagnostic clinical risk prediction models for 12-month onset and course of eating disorders among adolescents in the community

Affiliations

Development of transdiagnostic clinical risk prediction models for 12-month onset and course of eating disorders among adolescents in the community

Deborah Mitchison et al. Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To develop and internally validate risk prediction models for adolescent onset and persistence of eating disorders.

Methods: N = 963 Australian adolescents (11-19 years) in the EveryBODY Study cohort completed online surveys in 2018 and 2019. Models were built to predict 12-month risk of (1) onset, and (2) persistence of a DSM-5 eating disorder.

Results: Onset Model. Of the n = 687 adolescents without an eating disorder at baseline, 16.9% were identified with an eating disorder after 12 months. The prediction model was based on evidence-based risk factors for eating disorder onset available within the dataset (sex, body mass index percentile, strict weight loss dieting, history of bullying, psychological distress, weight/shape concerns). This model showed fair discriminative performance (mean AUC = .75). The most important factors were psychological distress, weight and shape concerns, and female sex. Diagnostic Persistence Model. Of the n = 276 adolescents with an eating disorder at baseline, 74.6% were identified as continuing to meet criteria for an eating disorder after 12 months. The prediction model for diagnostic persistence was based on available evidence-based risk factors for eating disorder persistence (purging, distress, social impairment). This model showed poor discriminative performance (mean AUC = .65). The most important factors were psychological distress and self-induced vomiting for weight control.

Discussion: We found preliminary evidence for the utility of a parsimonious model for 12-month onset of an eating disorder among adolescents in the community. Future research should include additional evidence-based risk factors and validate models beyond the original sample.

Public significance: This study demonstrated the feasibility of developing parsimonious and accurate models for the prediction of future onset of an eating disorder among adolescents. The most important predictors in this model included psychological distress and weight and shape concerns. This study has laid the ground work for future research to build and test more accurate prediction models in diverse samples, prior to translation into a clinical tool for use in real world settings to aid decisions about referral to early intervention.

Keywords: eating disorder; illness course; onset; prediction model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Professor Hay receives sessional fees and lecture fees from the Australian Medical Council, Therapeutic Guidelines publication, and New South Wales HETIand royalties from Hogrefe and Huber, McGraw Hill Education, and Blackwell Scientific Publications, and she has received research grants from the NHMRC and ARC. She is Chair of the National Eating Disorders Collaboration Steering Committee in Australia and was a Member of the ICD-11 Working Group for Eating Disorders and was Chair Clinical Practice Guidelines Project Working Group (Eating Disorders) of RANZCP (2012–2015). She has prepared a report under contract for Takeda Pharmaceuticals and been funding for educational activities and is a consultant to Takeda Pharmaceuticals. All views in this paper are her own. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Descriptive visualizations of the distribution of cross-validated model performance metrics of elastic net and logistic regression models predicting eating disorders onset at Wave 2 based on Wave 1 data (N=687). AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AUPRC, area under the precision-recall curve.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Descriptive visualizations of the distribution of cross-validated model performance metrics of elastic net and logistic regression models predicting eating disorders persistence at Wave 2 based on Wave 1 data (N=276). AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AUPRC, area under the precision-recall curve.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahn J, Lee J-H, & Jung Y-C (2019). Predictors of suicide attempts in individuals with eating disorders. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 49(3), 789–797. 10.1111/sltb.12477 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.
    1. Aouad P, Hay P, Soh N, Touyz S, Mannan H, & Mitchison D (2019). Chew and spit (CHSP) in a large adolescent sample: Prevalence, impact on health-related quality of life, and relation to other disordered eating features. Eating Disorders, 1–14, 509–522. 10.1080/10640266.2019.1695449 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakalar JL, Shank LM, Vannucci A, Radin RM, & Tanofsky-Kraff M (2015). Recent advances in developmental and risk factor research on eating disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17(6), 42. 10.1007/s11920-015-0585-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, & Moons KG (2015). Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement. BMJ, 350, g7594. 10.1136/bmj.g7594 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types