Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Aug;34(8):1961-1969.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05530-4. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

The "Aberdeen Home Continence Stress Test": a novel objective assessment tool for female stress urinary incontinence

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The "Aberdeen Home Continence Stress Test": a novel objective assessment tool for female stress urinary incontinence

Catriona Young et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Clinical trials for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) require a robust, reliable, and responsive tool for objective assessment of SUI post-intervention. The Aberdeen Home Continence Stress Test (HCST) is a novel patient-reported objective assessment tool, aimed to be patient-friendly and reduce attrition rates by avoiding hospital appointments and prolonged pad-wearing. We aim to describe the HCST for the first time and evaluate its reliability, diagnostic accuracy, and response to change.

Methods: A secondary analysis of the Single-Incision Mini-Slings (SIMS) study (a prospective multicentre randomised control trial (RCT) comparing two surgical treatments of SUI was performed. In SIMS (n = 600 women), the objective outcome was assessed by the 24-h pad test, while the patient-reported success rates were assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 15 months, 2 years and 3 years post-randomisation. Participants were instructed to perform the HCST before and after the 24-h pad test. The HCST was analysed in relation to reliability, validity, and the relationship between the 24-h pad test and HCST results and finally with regard to its responsiveness to change in PGI-I. (Trial registration-number ISRCTN93264234, registration date 14/01/2014).

Results: Compared to the 24-h pad test, the sensitivity of the HCST ranged from 0.81-0.95, specificity was 0.76-0.79, negative predictive value was 0.96-0.99 and positive predictive value was 0.32-0.43. Reliability was indicated by high-performing Cronbach's alpha value (> 0.7). An improvement of ≥ 2 leakage groups on the HCST (for example from Large at baseline to Small leakage at follow-up) was strongly associated with patient-reported success on PGI-I (OR 4.38, 95% CI 2.31, 8.31).

Conclusions: The HCST is a valid and reliable patient-reported objective assessment tool that can be used for assessing SUI in surgical trials with good specificity, sensitivity, and consistency.

Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; Incontinence; Measurement tool; Stress incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5–26. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper J, Annappa M, Quigley A, Dracocardos D, Bondili A, Mallen C. Prevalence of female urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life in a cluster population in the United Kingdom (UK): a community survey. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015;16(4):377–382. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000371. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krhut J, Zachoval R, Smith PP, Rosier PF, Valanský L, Martan A, Zvara P. Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodynam. 2014;33:507–510. doi: 10.1002/nau.22436. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Alessandro G, Palmieri S, Cola A, Barba M, Manodoro S, Frigerio M. Correlation between urinary symptoms and urodynamic findings: is the bladder an unreliable witness? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;272:130–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yeung JY, Eschenbacher MA, Pauls RN. Pain and embarrassment associated with urodynamic testing in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(5):645–650. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2261-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types